jpanhalt said:If you are in a positition where its important that you know the difference, you should be able to do the conversion. John
jpanhalt said:If you are in a positition where its important that you know the difference, you should be able to do the conversion. John
jpanhalt said:If you are in a positition where its important that you know the difference, you should be able to do the conversion. John
jpanhalt said:If you are in a positition where its important that you know the difference, you should be able to do the conversion. John
rjvh said:Yes it was the United States. The scientific community was behind it. The auto industry was OK with it. Aviation fought it tooth and nail. Worldwide all altimeters are in feet and only feet. English and feet are still the language of Air Trafic Control. The beverage industry was OK with it. The resistance came from ordinary people who refused to get on board.Papabravo said:We tried going metric in the 1980's and it was a disaster.
i asume we is USA
why it was a disaster???
Australia did the same thing somewhere in the 60s or 70s with not to much problems
Papabravo said:[ Aviation fought it tooth and nail. QUOTE]
smells like it was a NASA conspiracy to keep the foot mesurements
rjvh said:i do agree with you on this one
but it'a pain in the ass if you have the differences like liter, imperial gallon, the normal gallon
or in pressure PSI, Newton square cm, pascal or colum of water in meters
(these are the conversions i normaly work with in my work)
if you go to the weight than sudenly in great brittain you don't weight kilos or pounds but stones
Robert-Jan
ericgibbs said:hi,
Its illegal to sell produce in the UK, using Stones and Pounds.
The UK started going metric in the 1970's.. as you may know the money is also in decimal.
Can you imagine the problems UK engineering students had working in FPS [foot-pound-seconds] and Pounds, shillings and pence. using a slide rule.
For one, I am well pleased that we use the metric system.
rjvh said:I don't think NASA had anything to do with it. More like pilots and air traffic controllers. How many accidents would you be willing to tolerate in the changeover?Papabravo said:[ Aviation fought it tooth and nail. QUOTE]
smells like it was a NASA conspiracy to keep the foot mesurements
Nigel Goodwin said:You obviously live in a different UK
If you go to the butchers or the supermarket, it's common practice to buy food in pounds and ounces as well as grams, all the road signs are in MPH as well - we're only partially metric.
Check you super market packaging,
Obviously as the older generation die out the young ones growing up have never used non-metric measurements - except for miles!.
I've never used slide rules - I've always found them completely useless - an 'educated guess' at best. I found it far easier, faster, and more accurate to use a log book!.
ericgibbs said:hi,
Its illegal to sell produce in the UK, using Stones and Pounds........
CheapSlider said:Car engine capacities were in cc (or litres) well before.
Nigel Goodwin said:Were engine capacities ever not in cc's ? - I've never seen anything specified differently, and I've had experience on some VERY old motorbikes.
CheapSlider said:Threads - the US car industry was opposed because it didn't like metric threads. This was why metric thread pitches were changed in the early 70s and we had metric fine (to 1970) and now metric coasre (after 1970).
Nigel Goodwin said:But I thought the American used AF threads?.
I've got an old spanner in my pocket at work, I found it in the garage at work, all rusty - it's a Whitworth sized open ended spanner, and it fits almost every nut I ever come across at work
When the Beach Boys sung poetically about their '409, it was cubuc inches not cc'sNigel Goodwin said:Were engine capacities ever not in cc's ? - I've never seen anything specified differently, and I've had experience on some VERY old motorbikes.
Papabravo said:When the Beach Boys sung poetically about ther '409, it was cubuc inches not cc's
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?