hey,
I've got another calculus problem. The text that I'm using gives an example but the solution to the problem seems a bit incorrect. So I just want to know if it's a mistake by the author or is it actually correct and if so can you explain it to me? Here's the problem
![latex2png.2.png latex2png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38011-5e16880872b41bc1a73bc179c5939370.jpg)
![latex3png.2.png latex3png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38012-073cec160e436aef6076e3267fc1ee94.jpg)
I think that the solution should actually be:
![latex4png.2.png latex4png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38013-68e5cde6f0cbb242a9d145f765fecf0c.jpg)
since the anti-derivative of 30 is suppose to be 30t
I've got another calculus problem. The text that I'm using gives an example but the solution to the problem seems a bit incorrect. So I just want to know if it's a mistake by the author or is it actually correct and if so can you explain it to me? Here's the problem
![latex2png.2.png latex2png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38011-5e16880872b41bc1a73bc179c5939370.jpg)
![latex3png.2.png latex3png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38012-073cec160e436aef6076e3267fc1ee94.jpg)
I think that the solution should actually be:
![latex4png.2.png latex4png.2.png](https://www.electro-tech-online.com/data/attachments/38/38013-68e5cde6f0cbb242a9d145f765fecf0c.jpg)
since the anti-derivative of 30 is suppose to be 30t