Is there a reasonable way to open up an optocoupler to be light activated? Or is that a extremely delicate operation to attempt?
My son's snap circuits kit has a broken phototransistor. It uses it for several of the projects where light pulses make a tone from a speaker, or a fiber optic cable triggers a motor. It's fun stuff. But his phototransistor got broken off, and the leads snapped off inside so I can't seem to get a wire onto them. I don't have any phototransistors that work with visible light on me, it's just not a component I've had much occasion to use. But I have a ton of optocouplers with NPN phototransistors inside. If not I can put one in my next parts order, but this would get it working soon, and it's been a favorite activity of his while all the playgrounds are closed. Snap circuits have been sort of the science part of his home schooling lately.
Basically you want a Photo Transistor. You will need to know whether it is a PNP or NPN. But why cannibalize an opto coupler? Why not buy a PT?
Can we have some photos of the Zone 0?
Depends on what facilities you've available... I would have though that if you held it firmly-but-gently in a vise and filed flat down from the top with a fine-ish file you might be able to expose the transistor. If you've a bench grinder available, hold it in a pair of pliers, against the toolrest, and try the same.
Got to be worth a go if you've got optos to spare.
The classic example was the OC71 - which was a black painted glass encapsulated germanium transistor.
It was also available as a phototransistor, cunning called the OCP71, at a greatly inflated price.
Needless to say, it didn't take long until enterprising people found that simply scrapping the paint off an OC71 gave you an OCP71 for a fraction of the price.
As a result of this Mullard (the manufacturer) starting using opaque grease inside the standard OC71's.
Don't fool yourself, atferrari knowingly brought forward a vintage solution so I don't think it would be possible to be "many years too late". I think YOU just needed to feel smart today - another case of "Nigel-splaining".
I remember that when I had a early transistor radio to fix, the owner's asked curiously why the volume went up when he opened the back of the radio,
A couple of OC71's used with the paint flaking off answered the question.!
Max.
Just tried it out of curiosity - a BC477 from my misc semiconductors box, RS branded.
It works, no "goo" to clean and a very obvious switch-on effect when exposed to moderately bright light (changing from no reading to 60K on my meter). It would probably need to feed the base of another transistor to function as a serious switch, but definitely a functional phototransistor.
Don't fool yourself, @atferrari knowingly brought forward a vintage solution so I don't think it would be possible to be "many years too late". I think YOU just needed to feel smart today - another case of "Nigel-splaining".
well that didn't work, his kit uses visible light and these gates are all IR.
I do think I have some metal can NPN transistors around, and probably a few hundred in plastic cases. I'll give that a try.
And as for why I'm doing this, well I did order some but this is very educational and I think it's great how my son is into these electronic kits. He's7, if he has to wait a week he may lose interest.
You proposed that clear plastic cans and metal cans both hold a photo active semiconductor but claim the concept is somehow completely different In each case. However, my point was, atferrari could not be late for proposing a vintage solution. Do you agree with Nigel that atferrari was "many years too late" with his suggestion as Nigel accused? Or did you completely misunderstand my post?
I just gave that a try, there's a type that I have about 200 of that are NPN and the right current rating for his kit. It popped and exposed the die, but in this case it didn't work anymore. I probably cracked it. But with them being worth a few cents each I can afford to give it a few tries.
(And sorry, but you seem to just be picky and argumentative for the sake of it. It's bit like people that jump on a typo or spelling mistake and ignore the main topic in an answer).
(And sorry, but you seem to just be picky and argumentative for the sake of it. It's bit like people that jump on a typo or spelling mistake and ignore the main topic in an answer).
Just tried it out of curiosity - a BC477 from my misc semiconductors box, RS branded.
It works, no "goo" to clean and a very obvious switch-on effect when exposed to moderately bright light (changing from no reading to 60K on my meter). It would probably need to feed the base of another transistor to function as a serious switch, but definitely a functional phototransistor.