Constructing a circuit that would trigger my cordless house phone intercom circuit?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tantalum has a small size, good ESR and high capacitance density. They are unforgiving with overvoltage and reverse polarity.
Thanks. I was just trying to work out why they would use an expensive tantalum capacitor in preference to a standard electrolitic in what is obviously a built-to-a-price commodity item.

I haven't managed to work out what capacitance it is:


The marking read 476J 20P53.
 
476, like resistor code but picofarads:, so 47 + six zeos: 47 000000 pF or 47uF
I'd guess it's 20V rated.
 
Reactions: Buk
476, like resistor code but picofarads:, so 47 + six zeos: 47 000000 pF or 47uF
I'd guess it's 20V rated.
Thanks.

That means its not even particularly high capacity for is physical size compared to alu/polymer at < half the price. again I'm wondering why tantalum?
 
Thanks. I was just trying to work out why they would use an expensive tantalum capacitor in preference to a standard electrolitic in what is obviously a built-to-a-price commodity item.

Small size, easier machine manufacturing, and in china the cost is probably no different - and may even be cheaper?.
 
I'd guess the track length is tuned to 1/4 wavelength at the operating frequency - they could then act as "metal insulators" to prevent RF being passed through the external power cable.

Is this a reasonable explanation of what you were describing?


And could I confirm this hypothysis by measuring the length of the tracks, to see if the frequency makes sense in this context?
 
And could I confirm this hypothysis by measuring the length of the tracks, to see if the frequency makes sense in this context?

Yes, that's it - just remember you have to allow for the velocity factor in that material. Somewhere around 0.66 at a guess, making the physical length probably around 2/3 of the electrical length.
 
Measuring the length (in pixels) it comes out at 571. Measuring several known lengths it comes out to ~17pixels/mm *4 = ~135mm => 2.2 GHz. (Without any velocity factor adjustment)

The phone operates 1.9GHz.

Of course, I perhaps could include: the length of the lead to the inductor? The length of short side (parallel to the edge of the board) of the input terminal? The long edge of same?

I'm also intrigued by the thick white graphic lines. The description I quoted mentions that the antenna needs to be shorted. The board is 3 layer, so the graphics could indicate a middle layer direct connection between the terminal and the inductors, which would provide the short?
 
An impedance discontinuity can have a similar effect, to set the resonant length; just the change from the fine track to large pads could do it.

End loading capacitance from the other connections will also reduce the frequency, so it does look like a possibility as a resonant filter.

Edit - more info relevant to a series connected 1/4 wave line:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…