Why don't you just build a charger that pumps .3C into the battery when its below 1.3v and tapers off to .05C at 1.43 volts?
because for nimh, those voltages are not set in stone, the required voltage points vary with temperature , and from cell to cell. We would end up overcharging nimh, which nimh doesnt like.
So the best solution is always one that does not charge continuously
...here is a nimh cell which is specially built for emergency use.....
https://www.electro-tech-online.com...313e84b71c5-ca47-4790-81a0-88acff6808a3-2.pdf
......its nimh, and requires constant trickle charge as the datasheet says......so i cannot understand why it is being said that constant trickle charge is not good...becuase even this cell, which is probably the finest nimh-for-emergency cell in the world, demands a trickle charge.
...notice from the cell datasheet that the "fast" charge requires a "charge termination" method.......that means the charger will be expensive, -more expensive than a charger for nicd.
Note, whisker growth is from the cadmium.
..thats actually very interesting to hear about......but our nicd battery distributor sells emergency nicd's to companies all over the world and doesnt have this problem.
At the end of the day, our customers dont care.......most are only fitting the emergency unit because the regulations say they have to have it.....they are not particularly concerned if one or two cells fail here and there.........they just want that tick in the box which says they have passed the regulations, and cheap nicd allows them to do that.
....they certainly dont want a cell charging solution which has dv/dt or dT/dt monitoring etc........ but rather just C/10 for 24 hrs , then C/20 therafter...nice and cheap.
"C/10 for 24 hrs , then C/20 therafter" cannot be done with nimh because the C/10 for 24 hours would overcharge the nimh and invalidate the lifetime garantee.