Hi,
If i understand you correctly, the thing is we have to take the motion of the wire relative to the field into consideration too.
For a small change in angle in (a) the wire at the top of the coil is moving tangent to the B field, or parallel (but in the other direction).
For a small change in angle in (b) the wire at the left side of the coil (which was the top in (a) ) is moving perpendicular to B.
So in B we see the force is perpendicular to B so we get power generation ( the force must be perpendicular to the B field and to the wire).
There are two positions (plus or minus 90 degrees) where the tangential movement is exactly in line with the B field (either against or opposite).
There are two positions (0 or 180 degrees) where the tangential movement is exactly perpendicular to the B field.
The area of the coil presented to the B field has to be more in (a) than in (b) if you consider the coil to be made of only one turn (the simplest case). For a very very thin wire and approximating a field line as being very very thin but not zero, the coil in (b) would have only one set of field lines going through it that does not constitute an area (a square has area, but reduce that square to just one line on one side and it has zero area, a cube has volume, but reduce that to one side only and there is zero volume). So the x,y plane cuts the coil in B, but the y,z plane cuts the coil in (a) (where x is left and right, y is into and out of the page, and z is up and down). The flux lines are passing through any surface in the y,z plane, the coil can be though of as a surface in the y,z plane in (a) and in the x,y plane in (b).
Im not sure if i helped here or not yet