End of discharge voltage for "refreshing" of NiMH cells

Thomas Anderson

New Member
I have been reading some books on NiMH batteries. Some authors state that for optimum performance and longevity NiMH batteries need to be "exercised" or "refreshed" or "reconditioned", that is subject to a complete discharge, followed by a complete charge.

For instance, from "Ni-MH Technical Handbook (Panasonic, 2017)":
"As with Ni-Cd batteries, repeated charge and discharge of these batteries under high discharge cut-off voltage conditions (more than 1.1V per cell) causes a drop in the discharge voltage (which is sometimes accompanied by a simultaneous drop in capacity). The discharge characteristics can be restored by charge and discharge to a discharge end voltage of down to 1.0V per cell."

This is form the "Handbook of Batteries (Linden, 2002)":
"The voltage drop occurs because only a portion of the active materials is discharged and recharged during shallow or partial discharging. The active materials that have not been cycled change in physical characteristics and increase in resistance. The active materials are restored to their original state by the subsequent full discharge-charge cycling."

One author states that such an "exercise" should be done for NiMH batteries at least once every three months.

There is some disagreement as to what "end of discharge voltage" should the cells be discharged to. Some authors suggest 1.0V per cell, others 0.9V per cell. Most authors agree that overdischarge is detrimental to NiMH batteries, but the rationale that they provide is only applicable for cells connected in series: if you discharge several cells connected in series, then because of the capacity mismatch one or more of the cells might get their polarity reversed, if the cut-off voltage is too low. To prevent that from happening people suggest setting the cut-off voltage to 1.0V per cell, or even higher when more cells are connected in series.

Polarity reversal is no doubt detrimental, but it could not happen if cells are discharged individually in a "constant resistance" mode (that is being connected to a load of a "constant" resistance). It is established that for NiCd batteries, discharging to a voltage below 0.9V per cell frequently works better for restoring the battery's performance.

In addition to this I have not found info on how this end of discharge voltage should be measured. By logic it should be the open circuit voltage, but if you look at the discharge plots, it seems as if they measure it with the load connected to the cell.

If you connect a load to a cell, the voltage will keep decreasing, but as soon as you disconnect the load the voltage will start increasing back, not to the original value, but considerably.

Say, I had been discharging a NiMH cell (an AA battery) in a "constant" resistance mode for about 30 hours and the voltage has dropped to 4.8 mV with the load still connected. After I disconnected the load, the cell's voltage started to increase rapidly and in an hour the cell's voltage has risen to 1.1V. Does this mean that the cell was not fully discharged?

So I have these questions:
1) What is the best end of discharge voltage for "refreshing" of a single NiMH cell in a "constant resistance" mode?
2) What is safe end of discharge voltage for discharging of a single NiMH cell in a "constant resistance" mode?
3) Is this an open circuit voltage, or a voltage with the load connected to the cell?
4) If this is an open circuit voltage then how one can practically measure it while discharging a single NiMH cell?
 
For discharging one cell by itself:

1) 0.9V
2)0V
3)Load connected
4)NA


But unless you have a application where you have experienced a drop-off in capacity, I don't think this "refreshing" is worth the effort.
 
3)Load connected
But if you measure the end of discharge voltage with the load still connected then how can you ensure a complete discharge of the cell? If you set the cut off voltage to 0.9V, the actual depth of discharge will depend on the discharge current: the higher the current, the smaller the depth of discharge. In one example that I gave the voltage with a load dropped to almost zero (4.8mV), and once the load was disconnected the cell's voltage rose to 1.1V. Thus, the cell was not completely discharged.
I don't think this "refreshing" is worth the effort
Since people research this topic, it kind of hints that it is worth the effort. Maybe not for everyone. Some people just use primary batteries and throw them away.
 
once the load was disconnected the cell's voltage rose to 1.1V. Thus, the cell was not completely discharged.
The amount of charge that's left in the battery, once it reaches 0.9V under load (for reasonably small discharge currents) it likely too small to be of concern.
But if you want to complicate the discharge protocol by disconnecting the load before the voltage measurement, you are welcome to do that.
Since people research this topic, it kind of hints that it is worth the effort. Maybe not for everyone
I just have doubts that the memory effect is large enough to be worth the "refresh" effort for most typical applications of the battery.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…