1. Current AC: Maximum input current:200A; True-rms measurement; Frequency response 50Hz-60Hz
2. Voltage DC: Input impedance:10 MΩ; Maximum input voltage: 600V DC
3. Voltage AC: Input impedance:10MΩ; Maximum input voltage:600V AC; True-rms; Frequency response: 45~1000HZ
The meter has NOT arrived yet but i went ahead and did this test.
My meter measured the same 9.75-10v. The tool was under no load.
Makita LS1018 with a 13AMP 4300rpm motor
No. TP A and GND is the current transformer winding. It has an AC voltage that is rectified thru the diode to point B.
TP A /Gnd should be about 20v AC.
so at this time were not looking to trigger the relay at this time but measure AC DC voltage created by the CT. I can absolutely use a lamp. I did not realize the power tool had that low of an AMP draw. Seeing that the DC voltage at TPB was 10v I was expecting a much higher reading than the 4Amps.
I have a 100watt bulb. It should draw about an amp. Ill set up and report back.
so at this time were not looking to trigger the relay at this time but measure AC DC voltage created by the CT. I can absolutely use a lamp. I did not realize the power tool had that low of an AMP draw. Seeing that the DC voltage at TPB was 10v I was expecting a much higher reading than the 4Amps.
I have a 100watt bulb. It should draw about an amp. Ill set up and report back.
R4 should be a 1/2 watt (min) resistor (your schematic post #171).
A WORD OF CAUTION: Never operate the CT without the load resistor (R4) connected to its secondary coil.
The CT secondary coil presents a HIGH VOLTAGE SHOCK HAZARD if operated without R4 connected to its coil.
It will generate literally THOUSANDS of volts.
This is why there was mention is earlier posts NOT TO BREADBOARD THE CT (because of the risk of an open circuit).
If you are satisfied with the way the peak detector is operating, then there is no need to test any further.
When ready to use, adjust the trigger by connecting an AC load that presents the desired current, then adjust pot U1 to energize or de-energize the relay.
I did not see that. I must have overlooked it. I would have not done that if I knew. Im sending the board out for production. I have re-named the resistors. Ive also added test points markings to the underside of the board for future testing.
I did not see that. I must have overlooked it. I would have not done that if I knew. Im sending the board out for production. I have re-named the resistors. Ive also added test points markings to the underside of the board for future testing.
The TP's were intended as a communication tool for us but placing on the board is ok.
Suggestion:
It is common practice that when a PC board contains hazardous voltage potentials, a dashed-line and/or annotation is placed around or near the area to draw attention of the hazard to technicians for safety.