Because he now has to measure the voltage 16X faster he needs a faster ADC, and because the data takes 16x more "space" he needs a micro with more RAM, and because the math is more complicated he must upgrade to the next faster CPU, and that new CPU only cones in the next bigger package, and the code just ran off the end of PROM, and now none of it fits on the old PCB, and free is not free.
As he's wanting to read the ADC SLOWLY (in order to average the readings) he doesn't need a faster CPU (and could probably use a far slower one), likewise the space requirements - which are extremely minimal, as are the maths requirements.
The entire idea is trivial - and he could probably have written it in the time he took to write the original question.
Because he now has to measure the voltage 16X faster he needs a faster ADC, and because the data takes 16x more "space" he needs a micro with more RAM, and because the math is more complicated he must upgrade to the next faster CPU, and that new CPU only cones in the next bigger package, and the code just ran off the end of PROM, and now none of it fits on the old PCB, and free is not free.
I'd take that as a mean or average value, just avoiding any spikes or glitches that would have thrown a single instantaneous sample reading at the wrong instant.
I still think just using the built-in response control or an R-C filter will give the required result.
The original post sets the parameters pretty well:
I'd take that as a mean or average value, just avoiding any spikes or glitches that would have thrown a single instantaneous sample reading at the wrong instant.
I still think just using the built-in response control or an R-C filter will give the required result.
The original poster asked a question, and made one additional post where he didn't address any of the assumptions made and said thanks for the ideas. A total of 80 words.
That has lead to continuing debates about what he really wants to do spanning 27 replies and a total of 1296 words, continuing a week after his only reply.
It's really humorous. Especially since most of the "debate" is being carried out by "most helpful members".