I am just gonna have to flat out disagree with you Spec, and strongly disagree I do.
First of all, were talking HP here, your TLC worry is low unfounded as the likely hood of failure is low and thus financial risk is low. Even tho this is more meter than the original poster needs, as I mentioned, he will grow into it, and if the person learns quickly as LG has, he will be wishing for such a meter sometime down the road, sooner than one might think. As this meter does everything he needs for the moment, he has got that base covered along with the confidence that his/her measurement is most likely very accurate. Further, with the ever growing popularity of interfacing to sensor technology, the 2W,4W feature will prove invaluable.
And just to re-iterate as this is where I feel most strongly about, the OP will grow into the meter, and if he passes it up now, he may regret it as good deals are hard to find, especially when you need it.
To further support my argument concerning the TLC, I present photo below as exhibit A. These two instruments are owned by me, used almost daily and are something on the order of 30 years old, and when compared to my more modern instruments one might swear I was lying that they have not been calibrated in over 30 years. As always, I respect your opinion and as you do make very valid points, I think the price versus risk ratio on this meter makes the purchase of the meter a good idea, and besides, even if the OP loses interest and no longer wants the meter, he will have no problem at all selling this meter, and maybe just maybe all the while make a small profit. Well, I spoke my piece, and as mentioned, I highly respect your opinion, and I hope I have made some good points as well.
View attachment 99464