My sincerest apologies.
But this is what I was doing. I was thinking that, 2s + 12 = 2(s+1) + 5(2), corresponding terms should agree with each other, and this made me to equate "12" with "6(2)". Sorry.
Many thanks.
Regards
PG
No problem. That's the difficulty with mistakes. Once we make one, it's then hard to see the error right away. Often it takes a fresh eye to catch it. Hence, either having a friend look or taking time away from the problem and going back later usually reveals the mistake much faster than just staring at it.
The good thing here is that you knew there might be a mistake in your work and your were intent on tracking it down.
I wish I could tell you that this gets better as you get more experienced, but my experience is that it does not get better, and then you get old and it gets worse. Age gives you experience that keeps you from making amateurish mistakes, but it degrades your faculties which can allow you make more stupid mistakes, if you don't keep your guard up.
The inevitability of invisible mistakes is why engineering always includes the "due-dilligence" effort of verification, which includes theoretical double- triple- or quadruple-checking, experimental verifications under temperature, vibration and other extremes and field testing under worst case conditions, if possible.
The consequences of mistakes also gets worse as you get more experienced. A mistake on a test might hurt your grade, but a mistake on a real-world design might hurt a person.