Putting aside my opinion about the appropriateness of your response, if it was in response to anything that I wrote that implied that you shared crashsite's sentiments, then I have not made that determination.
Blah blah blah. Troll.
Actually, that wont help too much. What he needs to convert is his mind away from his childish, pointless game. There's probably not much point in suggesting that he try to convert it to anything involving electronics or technology since it's obvious that the only interest he has in any of that is in how to use it to continue his ploy.
I admit it. I was wrong. I thought he'd pretty well exhausted the range of piddly, pointless ploys to keep his game alive. But, this one was his next move. We should learn from it.
Of course, he's not going to let on that he's trying to actually understand anything but, he's now going out and doing searches on the internet to come up with some semi_related, esoteric crap that he can pretend that he needs assistance with. Ohm's Law is too "useful" so, he throws out some formulas he found on Wiki as his way to cry out for his next his next round of attention.
Okay, you gave hime a simple problem and some prompts. Let's see if he manages to actually come up with the correct answer (BTW: that grinding noise you are hearing is the rusty wheels turning in his head as he figures out how to make sure that the correct answer is the last thing he will come up with).
He has vectored around my predictions in the past but, I don't think he can vector around this one (at least not by doing what he knows is the right thing) without tipping his hand.
As I said, watch and learn, boys and girls.
It's the formula to estimate the resistance form one end of a sheet to the other.Is this formula used to estimate the resistance between point electric contacts on a sheet?
Read the Wikipedia artical, it should be fairly obvious.I don't know what L means.
I will not try to help you any more unless you answer the problems I set you in my previous post.It would be helpful if someone would tell me if L in R = pL/A = pL/(Wt) - at Sheet resistance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, means length of the sheet, the length between arbitrarily located point electrical contacts on the sheet, and/or the length between a different type of electrical connection resulting in a uniform current through a line defining a side of the sheet - and perhaps a uniform current through the opposite side as well.
It's the formula to estimate the resistance form one end of a sheet to the other.
Read the Wikipedia artical, it should be fairly obvious.
I will not try to help you any more unless you answer the problems I set you in my previous post.
I'm trying to figure out if a formula - Rs = (V/I) * CF - at Sheet Resistance might apply. Does anyone know another name for CF that I can use in a search?
I love the idea of putting the ball in his court and watching him squirm as he conives ways to try to continue groveling for attention without actually showing any cognizance.
You have to learn to walk before you can learn to run. I would suggest that we withhold all technical assistance from this guy until he shows that he has at least taken the effort to learn and be able to apply, Ohm's Law.
I love the idea of putting the ball in his court and watching him squirm as he conives ways to try to continue groveling for attention without actually showing any cognizance.
It surely shouldn't be too difficult for a guy who is asking for detailed technical information on advanced levels to be able to show compentency in something taught in the first week on any high school level electronics class.
Okay, okay...I thought I could do it and, bleieve me I wrestled with my demons (and lost) so...
Perhaps an appropriate search for CF for you might be, "c**t face"?
I think hes doing rather well being you keep giving him the attention! Direct attention or not, he is still hanging in there thanks to you!
Crashsite 0
Jasonbe 1
I am almost half tempted to give jasonbe positive rep points just for playing you guys so very well!
As inept as he may look at electronics and electrical theory he obviously knows how to play this game and he is playing it very very well!
I think hes doing rather well being you keep giving him the attention! Direct attention or not, he is still hanging in there thanks to you!
Crashsite 0
Jasonbe 1
I am almost half tempted to give jasonbe positive rep points just for playing you guys so very well!
As inept as he may look at electronics and electrical theory he obviously knows how to play this game and he is playing it very very well!
United States
In the United States, according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the expression "Patent Pending" as such does not protect an invention until the actual patent is published and/or issued:
"A patentee who makes or sells patented articles, or a person who does so for or under the patentee is required to mark the articles with the word "Patent" and the number of the patent. The penalty for failure to mark is that the patentee may not recover damages from an infringer unless the infringer was duly notified of the infringement and continued to infringe after the notice. The marking of an article as patented when it is not in fact patented is against the law and subjects the offender to a penalty. Some persons mark articles sold with the terms "Patent Applied For" or "Patent Pending." These phrases have no legal effect, but only give information that an application for patent has been filed in the Patent and Trademark Office. The protection afforded by a patent does not start until the actual grant of the patent. False use of these phrases or their equivalent is prohibited." [5] You may use the term "patent pending" or "patent applied for" so long as a patent application has actually been filed. If you use these terms when no patent application has been filed it is deemed as a deceptive act and a fine may be imposed for each offense.[6]
I can see what you're asking but you need to learn the basic first.It is obvious to me that L has something to do with the length of the sheet. It is not obvious to me if the formula is independent of the location of electrical contacts; if L means the distance between electrical contacts; if L does mean the distance between electrical contacts - if the electrical contacts as implied by the formula have to be point contacts, or if the electrical contacts have to be such that there is one or two uniform currents through lines defining opposite sides of the sheet.
I found Jason's "Biodemometric" site. Might offer some insight to what Jason is getting at. (IMHO sounds like complete bunk)
**broken link removed**
Seems the product has a name and even though it doesn't exist he claims to have applied for a patent for the RBSM-1000. Care to share the patent # with us Jason?
I try not to pass up educational opportunities. I don't feel like I have to either agree with or respect someone to be able to glean some insight from them.
I also don't mind doing a little "baiting" now and then when I feel that someone deserves it...occasionally, sometimes even when they don't. After all, I did succeed in making one of the guards laugh at Buckingham Palace but, to be fair, it was at one of the gates on the back side and I figured it was good practice for him if he ever expected to make it out front. But, I did promise him that I wouldn't tell the Queen and...unless she reads this forum...I still haven't.
But, don't think I didn't notice that Mr. be's Ohm's Law dissertation is as rambling and as full of as much nonsense as he figures he can load it up with and still "satisfy" the requirement. But, as the Queen herself might say, "We are not amused".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?