Monitoring a few analog values and a few binary bits over the internet?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Just an update, I gave the wrong battery number - the ER26500 is only 8.8aH, it's actually an ER34615 that's 19aH, and it's one of those we're sacrificing in this test. Ooh - just checked the price of them, £21.13+vat from Farnell
 
I remember being shocked at the price of Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries. Good capacity though, 70Wh per cell.

Mike.
 
Here is an idea that I helped with about 30 years ago. I had a friend with the same problem as MikeMI. The friend had a telephone line at the remote location. I was in the process of assembling telephone answering devices. He used that and would call the number at the remote location , and if he got a certain message on the answering machine he knew there was a problem.
 

Well the 18650's ran out, they lasted 18 days, 4 hours, and 12 minutes - while transmitting every five minutes - a total of 5166 transmissions.

By my calculations the EVE 19Ah should make around 38.86 days - which would easily win me the bet

The EVE version was started on 17/8/2018 at 11:08, and so far has sent 3287 transmissions - so 60 days would be October - annoyingly the battery voltage of these cells is incredibly flat, until they suddenly die - so the battery voltage readings aren't helping
 
OK, the EVE test board stopped on 6th September, it only managed 20 days, 6 hours and six minutes, and sent 5454 transmissions - a rather disappointing total I thought? - still it easily won me the bet

I've stuck a voltmeter on the battery, and it reads about 3.2V, but resetting the PIC and starting it running again produces dips below 3V on the battery, as the GSM modem draws current from it.

Considering I was taking no low current precautions, not even putting the PIC to Sleep, running at 64MHz, and transmitting every 5 minutes I don't suppose it's too bad. The intended application will only transmit probably once a week, then go back to sleep. Ignoring the standby current in sleep, 5454 transmissions is over 100 years at one a week

Even once a day (which is likely to be an option) is well over ten years (almost 15 years) - and the aim is to achieve 5 years plus battery life - which is why the EVE batteries are used, as they have a very long shelf life.

As far as consumption in Sleep goes, I'm no further forward at reducing it than I was before - but apparently under 100uA is the standard aim of other commercial units - which I'm easily exceeding.

Oh, as far as the bet went, I had a free Breakfast at Weatherspoons this morning.
 
I'll bet it was the best breakfast ever.

Mike.

Weatherspoons is a lot cost pub chain, but they do decent food at a decent price - and their breakfasts are pretty good - and there's one not too far from where we work
 
Just been having a quick measure, it's taking about 13mA quiescent (just running a loop waiting), so that alone used 6.3Ah of battery life during the test - adding a SLEEP command dropped it to around 50uA, which is only 0.025Ah for the same period.

I couldn't use sleep for the test (which in any case would have took too long), as I've got no provision on that test board for a 32KHz xtal, and I'm actually using those pins as I/O. The Li-Ion test used the exact same settings, so it gave a valid comparison between the two.

My new test board, which is designed to fit an existing commercial enclosure, has a 32KHz xtal onboard, and uses a 16F18446 instead of an 18F.

While I've been typing this the sleeping 18F has actually drifted down to about 30uA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…