Is there a particular reason or convention which says I should display the MS or LS digit first on a multiplexed numeric display?
Any display multiplexing hints or tips from the infinitely more experienced (or more educated!) than me?
I'm using a PIC to output bcd with a clock signal, and with an input to sync to an end digit. Bcd to 7-seg converter, with some gates to pull off extra values for symbols. Display might be a (surplus) vfd (I wanted Panaplex, but have you seen the price of those things?!) or I was even thinking about nixie tubes - but I digress.
No, it's a plain 6 digit + sign numeric output. I'll bear that in mind if ever I do that though - might be fun! I'm starting to wonder if the on time for the display as a whole is going to be long enough though - it's now only a small portion of quite a lot of code now. Starting to think about latching schemes. Will be posting the code on my blog soon...
No, it's a plain 6 digit + sign numeric output. I'll bear that in mind if ever I do that though - might be fun! I'm starting to wonder if the on time for the display as a whole is going to be long enough though - it's now only a small portion of quite a lot of code now. Starting to think about latching schemes. Will be posting the code on my blog soon...
Look at the MAX7219 - great devices although a little expensive. I might even have some dev boards with one on for a fiver or so if you're interested ?
Have a flick through the datasheet and see if it could be adapted to your requirements
Unfortunately the 16F57 has no interrupts, and I'm wishing I'd got a device that has them - but now I have the chip so just working with that. The MAX7219 looks like a great chip - possibly overkill for this though. Will see.
I've done it with nixies, dont forget to increase the current through the display by the number of tubes, 4 tubes 4 times etc.
I usually use interrupts for that, you cant with the '57 though.
A code efficient way to do it is to shift a logic 1 along the outputs that control the commons.
My nixie prototype, the flying dot is a dekatron tube:
Unfortunately the 16F57 has no interrupts, and I'm wishing I'd got a device that has them - but now I have the chip so just working with that. The MAX7219 looks like a great chip - possibly overkill for this though. Will see.
That's a bit of a bizarre chip to start with?, I would suggest you move to a 14 bit device (instead of a 'modern' replacement for an antique 12 bit OTP device).
Remember to turn the digit drivers off for a bit, for inter-digit blanking, otherwise a lit segment from a previous shows up lightly on the next multiplexed digit.
dr pepper: nice prototype - I like the gloweyness...
Nigel: The choice of '57 was made when I thought I was just going to be doing a straight binary to bcd (or 7 segment) conversion and not much else, so I just wanted the simplest device I could find, with enough i/o for the auto-ranging. I've come from knowing nothing about microcontrollers so wanted to avoid a very steep learning curve. I actually made a mistake with my first purchase and bought a 16C57 - not realising it's an otp device, since bought a 16F57 - so I'll work out any bugs with that and use the 16C57 in the final device.
Keepitsimplestupid: I'm using a >9 code for blanking so 2 bits are just gated off and used to stop the digit turning on.