hyedenny,
You are aware that the chemistry of the high altitude ozone layer is very different to what happens on the ground with traffic fumes aren't you? It's all that UV light at high altitude which can drive reactions that would not otherwise occur. Which domain were you referring to?
Ozone depletion to me has always meant the depletion of the high altitude layer which is greatest at the poles. And to restate as far as I know CO2 has nothing to do with that. Ozone depletion at ground level is actually a good thing. At high altitude it is a bad thing.
I stated quite clearly in my post my understanding of the the CFC chemstry that causes the breakdown of high alitude ozone and I asked you to explain the CO2 chemistry that you stated which is responsible for depletion. Nowhere did I state you were wrong, merely that what you stated is counter to my understanding. I'm sorry if "I think you'll find" is such a personal attack. My suggestion there is to grow a thicker skin.
You made this statement:
Its Carbon Dioxide that is mainly to blame for any ozone depletion.
Which I chose to challange. Thus I brought in CFCs since they were pertinant to the discussion.
Indeed in your subsequent post you missed the point entirely by ignoring the question and, indirectly at least, calling me a goofball.
This is a classic case of an an hominiem argument because you are unable to defend your own argument.
For the record, and to show your brilliance, at least as far as you percieve it, how carbon dioxide is responsible for ozone depletion, as you so clearly stated:
Its Carbon Dioxide that is mainly to blame for any ozone depletion.
Show show me it is is not an ad hominiem argument and show the chemistry behind your assertion.
And I still suggest you tone it down, be civil and keep it reasonable.