Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

photo flash capacitor question

Status
Not open for further replies.

ckt-boarder

New Member
I have a circuit from an old camera that contains a photo flash capacitor. I am curious about what the label 'photoflash' really means. Assuming I have a photo flash cap and another polarized electrolytic cap that each have the same voltage and capacitance values, would these parts behave any differently? Would one discharge faster than another?
 
When the Xenon flash tube fires, it's almost like connecting a short across the charged photoflash capacitor. Photoflash caps are designed to withstand being charged and then connected to a virtual short, repeatedly. Regular electrolytics aren't designed to be treated that way.
 
As above, the photoflash cap will have a lower equivalent series resistance, which means 2 things the cap will produce a higher instantaneous current meaning a shorter brighter flash and also will not get as warm, much like a thicker cable carrying a high current.

If you fitted a standard cap it'd work, but the flash wouldnt be as bright, and it go on a ms longer or so, and if you took pic after pic the cap would heat up and if a high power flash might even explode.

Elecro caps in pc power supplys have a low esr, but still not low enough.
 
not only must they have low ESR, but have very robust connections between the internal foil plates and the terminals
 
As above, the photoflash cap will have a lower equivalent series resistance, which means 2 things the cap will produce a higher instantaneous current meaning a shorter brighter flash and also will not get as warm, much like a thicker cable carrying a high current.

If you fitted a standard cap it'd work, but the flash wouldnt be as bright, and it go on a ms longer or so, and if you took pic after pic the cap would heat up and if a high power flash might even explode.

Elecro caps in pc power supplys have a low esr, but still not low enough.

not only must they have low ESR, but have very robust connections between the internal foil plates and the terminals

Interestingly, low ESR doesn't help a photoflash capacitor stay cool. Image a charged electrolytic capacitor, discharging into a short (or very low resistance). The discharge current magnitude and waveform will be determined by the capacitor's ESR and ESL (mainly determined by the ESR).

Now, consider a capacitor with 1/2 the ESR (and the same ESL). The discharge current will be essentially doubled in magnitude and speeded up by a factor of 2. The instantaneous dissipation in the ESR will be increased by a factor of four, the loss per discharge increased by a factor of two (not by a factor of 4 because the effective discharge time is half as long), and the capacitor will got hotter, not cooler.

This is a result of the discharge current being determined by the parameters of the capacitor itself, and not by the external circuit parameters. That is what happens when discharging the capacitor into a short (or near short). The external circuit will, of course, have some effect on the discharge, but when discharging into a near short, the capacitor's own parameters will dominate the discharge characteristic.

For certain applications, for example a defibrillator, an external inductor is used to shape the discharge, and then a lower ESR may be beneficial. But for typical photoflash use, external inductors are not used.

Here's a list of ordinary capacitors. Look up the 350 Volt, 390 μF capacitor specs. The rated ESR is .51 ohms:

https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2013/07/381-383.pdf

Here's another list. These capacitors are specifically designed for photoflash service. Look up the 360 volt, 400 μF capacitor specs. The rated ESR is .497 ohms, essentially the same as a non-photoflash capacitor:

https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2013/07/7P.pdf

Somewhere I have an old application note concerning energy discharge capacitors. The ESR of electrolytic photoflash capacitors is not as important as the really good electrical connections to the foil, making the foil thicker, and getting the heat out. Regular electrolytics come in only a few case sizes, and many of the standard values are packaged in the next larger can, so that there is substantial space around the wound foil; in other words, the wound foil doesn't fit tightly into the can. Photoflash capacitors are sized so the wound aluminum foil fits tightly into the can, enhancing heat flow to ambient.
 
Your right, just goes to show lower parasitics doesnt necessarily mean an improvement.
The resistance of the higher esr cap in your explanation works as a dissipation limiter.
Such problems might well arise when the factor of the load shunt resistance is small compared to the esr.
 
The terminals in an electro cap are either spot welded or stitched to the foil.

As The Electrician mentioned, In an photoflash-rated capacitor, those stitches and welds are very robust and spread across several locations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

Back
Top