If a diode were permanently installed in a two terminal battery system, it would be rather hard to charge it! Plus the extra drop on other loads.
The motor draws a little under 8A at 12.4 volts and <11A at 16.8V.
That's under normal running conditions, once it has reached full speed.
Measure its DC resistance and work out the stall current! That's what it draws as it starts.
The 150A rating on the diode is for 8.3mA as an isolated surge. The motor takes rather longer than that to reach full speed, I suspect.
If twin TO-220 is really required, then I'll just stick with swapping battery packs as needed. There is just enough space in the bay where the SLA lived to fit two of my 4S packs. Just.
One TO-220 package per battery; each has two diodes. If there is a high enough rated one, you could use one half per battery.
I was originally thinking of these:
>google<
Can you squeeze one of these in? That should do for both batteries.
If you are going to permanently install both packs, you could equalise them first to full charge and ensure all cells are balanced, then hard wire them in parallel at both the main terminals and all cell junctions. That may eliminate one balance/protection board and save space.
The diodes are only needed it you will be connecting packs that may be in different states of charge.
...
Things are different for mass-produced consumer stuff, but for industrial-grade gear that we work with as a company, or my own stuff, I try to design & build things in "brick outhouse" indestructable quality. There is a lot of our gear dating back to the early 80s still in continuous use, and customers keep coming back because they know our stuff is designed to last.
I found very early on that there is a massive difference between what should in theory be reliable and what actually is reliable in the real world.
As the famous quote, in some version or other: “In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.”