Solid-state audio amplifier complexity vs valve/tube

Status
Not open for further replies.
The solid state designs have another advantage over tubes: they have complementary devices, NPN/PNP, Nchan/Pchan.
These allow direct coupling (with bipolar supplies).

Having said this, I love vacuum tubes, but only for nostalgia.
 

I'd be interested to see some suitable tests on it
 
Solid-state ..... complexity ...... vs valve/tube
Click to expand...
When I started electronics, I worked two hours to pay for a tube. The old men I learned from did not understand transistors.
I just checked and I am paying $0.02 for a surface mount version of a 2n2222a transistor.
One of the ICs I designed has 6000 transistors and we sold it for around $1.00usd. At some point I asked TI what it would cost to add 100 more transistors. They told me "nothing". When the price of parts approaches zero then complexity has no limit. My next part hit 100,000 transistors.
 
Nigel Goodwin said:
f you want to built a good quality simple old amp, google for the Leak Stereo 70
Click to expand...

Thank you! I will.

nigel wright said:
You can create a hybrid so that you don't need an output transformer.
Use transistors to buffer the output.
Click to expand...

Yes. I just built a simple stereo preamp to use with headphones. I used a simple triode per channel (common cathode, grid biased, no feedback). The output from the tube goes to a source-follower NMOS, with a current source. I just used a variable resistor to adjust bias.

The sound is great. I can't hear any kind of distortion, even using good headphones. And it works with low voltage.

I know that I could have achived the same (or better) result using a bipolar (or FET) instead of the triode. Most of the power goes to heat the filaments. But it is more an aesthetic matter.
At 12 V, the preamp draws 240 mA (the heaters take 150 mA, so a solid-state version could have been around 100 mA).
 
ronsimpson said:
I just checked and I am paying $0.02 for a surface mount version of a 2n2222a transistor.
One of the ICs I designed has 6000 transistors and we sold it for around $1.00usd.
Click to expand...

That's another story.
I was talking about simple audio amplifiers. Tube amplifiers sound really good to me. So, I started reflecting on why so much complexity was needed in newer designs (I said solid-state, not because of being solid-state, but because everything new is solid-state).

It seems that the reason is just: because it can be done, and it's cheap (and compact).
Thanks everyone for your thoughts about this.
 
Elerion said:
Tube amplifiers sound really good to me.
Click to expand...
I think so to but:
There are certain things you can do (distortion) that sound good. "warm" Some people like tube sound better.

There are two thoughts about how to make good amplifiers.
1) Make each stage low gain. 5 to 10 Then just live with that gain and distortion.
2) Make each stage high gain and use feedback. High gain comes with bad distortion in part because we don't care & no one remembers how to make amps with out distortion. Then use feedback to make the output follow the input.

When a amp is over driven into distortion, Tube amps (and FET amps) have a tendency to round top distort. Amps with heavy feedback flat top. Worse yet, transistor amps, when driven into their supplies, get sticky. The output will get stuck at the supply and it takes time for the output to pull back off the supply. (I should send pictures)

My opinion is that tube amps, when driven too hard, have a distortion that is less objectionable.
I think amplifiers should not color music. It should reproduce exactly what it sees.
 
A tube amplifier sounds "warm" because its transformer cuts high distortion (and program) frequencies. A vacuum tube produces even harmonics distortion that sounds "musical".
So of course the music is colored, it has highs cut and it has even harmonics added.
The distortion increases daily as the tube burns out until you cannot stand it anymore then replace the tube, over and over.
Some bands replace all vacuum tubes before each gig.
 
I found the Leak 70 Stereo amplifier quite complex as a first project of this kind.
What do you think about these simple ones?
The specifications seem great for much simpler designs.

I'm looking towards learning, not excelent performace.
 

Attachments

  • Tobey and Dinsdale.pdf
    882.8 KB · Views: 381
  • Low-Cost 15-W Amplifer - Ian Hardcastle and Basil Lane.pdf
    710.7 KB · Views: 359
You should look at modern amplifier designs, not amplifiers that used germanium transistors 56 years ago that are not available today.
Many low power amplifiers like those ones use amplifier ICs today. The LM3886 is 14 years old, is inexpensive and has excellent performance:
 

Attachments

  • LM3886 amplifier IC.png
    103.7 KB · Views: 313
Elerion said:
I found the Leak 70 Stereo amplifier quite complex as a first project of this kind.
What do you think about these simple ones?
The specifications seem great for much simpler designs.

I'm looking towards learning, not excelent performace.
Click to expand...

As already mentioned, those are antiques using transistors that haven't been available for many decades.

The first one looks very similar in complexity to the Leak Stereo 70, you should be comparing the power amplifier - not the entire pre-amplifier/amplifier assembly.
 
Elerion said:
What do you think about these simple ones?
The specifications seem great for much simpler designs.
Click to expand...
If you insist on a discrete design I would go with the 15W unit on the right as it uses mostly silicon NPN transistors, and I like the differential input stage for stable DC biasing of the amp.
 
The cheap simple 15W amplifier:
1) The DC current of the driver transistor is in the speaker causing the cone to be offset. Adding one resistor and one capacitor will fix it.
2) A frequency compensation capacitor is missing possibly causing instability.
3) A zobel network is missing at the output further causing instability due to the inductance of a speaker.
 
audioguru said:
The DC current of the driver transistor is in the speaker causing the cone to be offset. Adding one resistor and one capacitor will fix it.
Click to expand...
This is the 15W amp I was referring to.
It has an output capacitor to block any DC to the speaker.

 
Nigel Goodwin said:
The first one looks very similar in complexity to the Leak Stereo 70, you should be comparing the power amplifier - not the entire pre-amplifier/amplifier assembly.
Click to expand...

You mean the red portion of the image, right?


Could I just leave out the rest?

audioguru said:
You should look at modern amplifier designs, not amplifiers that used germanium transistors 56 years ago that are not available today.
Click to expand...

I was thinking on selecting new suitable transistors using SPICE simulation and some tweking.
I was aiming at understanding a simple design, so I can take decisions, not facing a complex design where I'm lost on many portions of it.
 
Interestingly! Marshall still prefer hybrid systems today!! So the valve output stage must be reasonable. Surely?
 
Elerion said:
You mean the red portion of the image, right?
Click to expand...

Of course, as you're only making a power amplifier. You might like to include the volume control as well though.

The Stereo 70 was a great amp, loads of power and sounds great - I've seen many of them used for PA or guitar use as well (including mine at times).
 
Ian Rogers said:
Interestingly! Marshall still prefer hybrid systems today!! So the valve output stage must be reasonable. Surely?
Click to expand...

Depends what you mean by 'reasonable'

Marshall (along with most other guitar amp manufacturers) use valves to give the specific low quality sound they are looking for, poor frequency response and masses of distortion.
 
crutschow said:
This is the 15W amp I was referring to.
It has an output capacitor to block any DC to the speaker.
Click to expand...
No. It uses the speaker as a resistor for "bootstrapping" then the current of driver transistor TR3 goes into the speaker which offsets its cone. Proper bootstrapping adds a resistor and capacitor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
  • Question
Solid State Relay for Hot Tub load Shedding?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Battman
B
M
  • Question
Power plug pinout for Hitachi IA-51 1969 Solid State Television
Replies
3
Views
1K
Nigel Goodwin
A
  • Question
Understaing parameters of transistors for swtich mode
Replies
15
Views
2K
danadak
P
Hot tubes/
Replies
4
Views
2K
paddy ryan
P
S
  • Question
Amplifier shutting down
Replies
19
Views
5K
Nigel Goodwin
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…