Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sin 3(x) = 3*sin(x) -4*sin^3(x).
Ron H said:Check out an analog multiplier, such as Analog Devices' AD633 (page 5).
I don't think you can take the square root of audio, because you can't take the square root of a negative number.epilot said:Hi Ron,
Thanks for the link,
yes I saw that circuit before, I want to use it but my circuit is working with 12 to 15V there is no NEGATIVE voltage for this square rooter,
I bought few 633 IC's few months ago for 5 or 6$ but did not use them yet,
Anyway the power supply is not able to generate any negative voltage, is there any way to convert or modify this circuit for a common power supply?
I need it for a kind of audio amplifier and want to get a square root from its ouput signal, to remove or limit kind of noise.
Ron H said:I don't think you can take the square root of audio, because you can't take the square root of a negative number.
OK, if you say so...epilot said:Yes that is correct, but you can do the job with offsetting the adudio signal.at the moment the biggest groblem is finding a sq rooter circuit with a common supply...
Ron H said:OK, if you say so...
This circuit just creates an "artificial GND" at VCC/2, similar to many single-supply op amp circuits.
Those op amps should be OK.epilot said:Ron,
Thank you very much for the circuit.
most of opamp circuits I have seen use TL072, I have no access to it, can I use LF411 or LF351 instead?
I think the answer is yes because it seems there is no difference rather than freq response and..
I"ll try to make your circuit tomorrow, hope to get a good result with it on audio freq.
Ron H said:Those op amps should be OK.
1. You won't be able to understand the square root of audio.epilot said:Ron, I made it, there is a problem, the output voice is not so clear(cut cut or something like that is in the voice) like when the dc voltage of an amplifier is not perfect?!
Do you have any idea?
perhaps we need to make more modification?