Starting with MPLAB X and new hardware

Status
Not open for further replies.

atferrari

Well-Known Member
Most Helpful Member
PIC micros.

Having worked with Win XP and PicStart Plus, always in Assembly, I will be resuming my activity now with Win 10 on my PC, after an almost three years impasse.

Writing in C is out of question.

To avoid wasting time, I would appreciate suggestions on the following:

a) After downloading MPLAB X ver 5.05, have not managed to download MPASM. It seems that I lost my chance when I was finishing the installation. I am at lost here. EDIT/ Found it, kind of built in. Please forget this point. /EDIT

b) Most recommended hardware. I never used a PicKit. I was even planning to buy an ICD3 !!

c) I would like to implement a few old projects that were 100% functional at the time.

d) I intend to continue, for now, focused on the 18F family.

Thanks for your time.
 
Last edited:
As to your points:

a) You found that MPASM get installed with the IDE. Good job.

b) With your present focused on the PIC18F buy a genuine PICkit3 from Microchip.
The PICkit4 is not ready for prime time, the ICD3 seems too expensive for just the PIC18F.

c) Without seeing a sample can't comment .

d) Good choice to get comfortable with the IDE with a project you know works.
 
gophert
As soon as I come back from Patagonia I will make a decision. Not sure of its limitations. I need few hours to browse the Web.
 
Nigel Goodwin said:
What's your problem with the PK4?.
Click to expand...


After a discouraging attention by the local representative on the phone, I managed to find this document

Whether Snap, PicKit4 or ICD4, there are no green G for almost the 100% of the 18F family. Am I understanding that table wrongly?

If true, I should I go the PicKit3 way. Do you agree?

BTW, anyone can tell about comparing Snap and PicKit4 in actual work?
 
A PICkit 2 clone might serve you very well with 18F micros. True, it doesn't support some of the bleeding edge parts, but it supports the bulk of the 18F series. Less than $10 on ebay and you get logic analyzer and UART tool functionality too.
 

It's a new device, and still under development, but it works perfectly on everything I've thrown at it - it's considerably faster then the PK3, and also can supply more power to an external circuit.
 
atferrari said:
Whether Snap, PicKit4 or ICD4, there are no green G for almost the 100% of the 18F family. Am I understanding that table wrongly?
Click to expand...
You do realise that that table is primarily aimed at ICD! The programmer will program ANY pic chip... The SNAP however hasn't the voltage doubler circuit so it CANNOT EVER do HV programming...

LV programming isn't good if you need the LVP pin.... I haven't purchased the PK4 yet, but it'll be in my inventory sometime soon..
 
This afternoon I got on the phone the "guy who knows". He explained that that list is referred to the suitability of the MPLAB X version - 5.05 in my case - I downloaded, and not the particular device used.

It seems that I have to decide then between Snap and PicKit 4.
 
atferrari said:
This afternoon I got on the phone the "guy who knows". He explained that that list is referred to the suitability of the MPLAB X version - 5.05 in my case - I downloaded, and not the particular device used.
Click to expand...

I would suggest not using 5.05 - I installed it the other week, only to find out that it's not fully compatible with previous versions - not only does it change the file format (so you can't load them in a previous version - no other upgrades have done that), it also requires previous working source code to be modified before it will run. All in all a backwards step I thought?.
 

Or a leap forward with no return... Thanks for the warning, Nigel.

Las thing to check is the pay per features that seems nobody can explain (PicKit 4).
 
That got me curious...
Looking at the release notes, they do include the facility to save in the old format, as a plugin component:

 
rjenkinsgb said:
That got me curious...
Looking at the release notes, they do include the facility to save in the old format, as a plugin component:
Click to expand...

Yes, you are right. I've read that but did not retain it; now I realize why: my last project was completed almost 3 years ago with MPLAB 8.92. No MPLBX until now. I will be starting really afresh.

And, just in case I repeat this here: Las thing to check is the pay per features that seems nobody can explain (PicKit 4).
 
atferrari said:
pay per features that seems nobody can explain (PicKit 4)
Click to expand...

That seems to originate here:
https://www.microchip.com/forums/m1064990.aspx

It's talking about the feature comparison of the Snap programmer vs Pickit 4 - cheap vs not-so cheap.
eg. If you get a Pickit 4 you are paying extra for the features that the Snap programmer does not have, in the features table 1.1 (on page 4) in the data here:
https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/MPLAB Snap In-Circuit Debugger IS DS50002787A.pdf

[I use ICD3; not cheap but they work really well].
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
MPLAB X again.
Replies
16
Views
5K
granddad
MPLAB X heads up
Replies
12
Views
8K
granddad
P
  • Question
MPLAB X How do I make a release version?
Replies
15
Views
5K
granddad
T
  • Solved
Can u help me with this counter!!! (PIC18F46K22)
Replies
8
Views
6K
Ian Rogers
Z
  • Question
How to Hardware Reset JDY-10 After Incorrect Baud Rate Command?
Replies
7
Views
3K
rjenkinsgb
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…