In short, yes an exercise..lol
Rant Begin;
Simple because I am curious. Yes a training via proxy if you would, based on your intellectual grasp, in your eyes per se.
If I can think of it, I can grasp it in my own right. I do notice that there are allot of miscommunication here via clash of terminology(Language)
Case in point, to me the way registers latch, is more meaning full to their absolute relation. Thinking of them mechanically is much more meaningful to my reality. However I know there is an order of things, but I can now visualize the operations mechanically. I can now think of a switch, and a parent switch, if the partner is bound to a state, that state must be satisfied. It really doesn't matter to me, that their can be
n amounts of state(s) and switches or just a single switch. It's just a layering process in my reality/grasp.
Having many ways-of-though available permits the observer to bound it to their reality This to me is the beauty of forums knowledge in general, open-source
Metaphorically I would say it's sort of a dance, a master student type. This Wu-Li way of thought works in my reality. But we may indeed argue simply because the terminology or ways-of-though are clashing.
Rant End.
-BaC
Edit: On the Wu Li type thinking, there is really no master nor a student, that is also a dance. Their roles dance in time, the only real separation between them is their wisdom the master is enlightened through the student's child like eyes.
I know "natural" logs are base e, but in my life I have no practical use for them. As for a sub-binary radix, why would anyone use a base lower than 2?
Would it be just as a fun mental experiment for intellectual stimulation? How would you represent the numerals? Why?