No. He has a valid point, particularly about finding qualified power system expertise. But I've danced with Vicor (and other high-density DC/DC companies) for a few decades, and one thing their products are *not* is "general". Unbelievable, alien-level magnetics technology, coupled with alien-level quirkiness.
Note: That's $175 ***each*** at 100 pieces, not "for" 100 pieces.
Relative to cost standards for "general product" products, Vicor (and all high-density DC/DC converter products) is expensive. You've got 50 cents per watt in the output device without the Vicor-recommended output filter or thermal management, plus the true cost of the PFC stage, plus the low voltage supply for the overvoltage monitor, plus the input common-mode noise filter (bricks are great at generating this), plus international safety certifications. The total cost will be much closer to $4 per watt than $1, in an industry where $1 per watt is considered high.
AND - you are chaining the product to an absolutely unique device with limited, sole-source supply. Per the concerns about long-term sustainability, this is a recipe for disaster.
The solution to the issues in his first paragraph is competent product definition that takes downstream support and evolution into account at the very beginning, not as an afterthought halfway through the design cycle.
One of the big buzzwords of product management out of the 80's was DFM - Design For Manufacturability.
Wrong.
For real product success, the M stands for Maintenance.
ak