The transformerless supply question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do not bring the forum down to this level!!! Keep it on topic... Verbal abuse will not be tolerated...
 
Yes sir, I have lots to learn - and loving every minute of it!
I don't see a problem troubleshooting the TLPSU. Plugged into my Isolation Transformer would give it isolation.

If you follow the whole X2 cap thing.....even with an Isolation Transformer you can still get shocked.

tvtech
 
Umm...., isn't that what "surge protectors" are for? TV Tech, I'm not trying to be a troll, I just really don't understand your position on this topic... I have 2 surge protectors everything is plugged into in case of voltage spikes.
A few months ago when we had a thunderstorm come through, a voltage spike from a lightening strike popped the breaker in one of my surge protectors. I went ahead and turned the other one off and disconnected them from the wall until the storm passed. Then I plugged them back in, and all was well.
Now, if this comment is unacceptable, then I give up!
 
Surge protectors are not able to handle frequent surges. They themselves fail and leave the circuit they are supposed to protect....well unprotected.

If you are trying to design something properly...rather rely on circuitry that can handle overload situations repeatedly..instead of designs that protect weak circuits.

Hopefully this makes sense.

tvtech
 
Last edited:
Yes, but I won't be connected to mains ground...

Correct but you you can still get belted if the load is lost on the supply you are trying to fix...

Whilst I feel sorry for you....I am around 51 Years now...also feel totally battered.

Thing is a Forum is a place to discuss things and respect the powers that be. Do not disrespect Moderation or some of the amazing people that take on that very hard task. Maybe you have to learn still. I don't know.

I have given you more dislikes.....if you can deal with that then we can talk.

Sit back and reason

Think about stuff. I really don't dislike you nor does anyone here in spite of you pushing Moderation to the limit. Any other Forum out there would have probably thrown you away. Luckily ETO has Moderators that don't take things up personally.

Referring to this thread: https://www.electro-tech-online.com/threads/performance-electric-cars.140421/page-6

Stay well,
tvtech
 
Last edited:
Well he was baiting me, which a moderator shouldn't do. I did get a little carried away though and I will apologize to him.
Back to the subject, yes it's true, we can get shocked with an isolation transformer. Mine is rated at 5Amps. That's a lot better than the Amps mains ground could give me.
Hey I don't want to argue, Ok?
 


Lovely stuff!!

We can all get along nicely together if we simply try.

Hey, I am too old to argue too

Regards,
tvtech
 
Hi,

Back on topic...

One of the first things they teach in electronics classes is how to measure voltage. They always say "keep one hand in your pocket" or something like that.

When it comes to power supplies there are many dangers. Capacitors blow up, transistors blow up and spew metal in various directions. The person entering ths field as a hobby for the first time has no idea what the dangers are, so we simply must tell them. This is especially true with voltages above maybe 15 volts or so.

We cant stop people from doing this as a hobby, and when they see an offline power supply they naturally get curious because it does not need a transformer, which is sometimes hard for them to get. So the best thing to do is tell them about the dangers and make it very clear, and then proceed with some circuit theory.

It wont help to avoid the subject...that could be worse because then they might experiment on their own without any guidance at all.

Any site that wants to talk about hobbies that might be dangerous should just post a disclaimer that appears when the member first signs up and possibly a sticky thread too.
 
 

And yet the same forum is currently let a certain recently banned member from here, openly discuss what are clearly avionic circuits, and despite them being told and indeed concluding the same themselves, are turning a blind eye and trying to help the person fault find them!!!


Funny old world!
And people still dont understand why I find it so hard to grasp certain rules and procedures! I am a logical thinker and simplistic person, I live in a complex and contradicting world. No wonder I struggle at times to fit in
 
I like old radio's and TV's, I dont have many (6 or 7), but I have tinkered with them all and restored to working, except one that is.
Some have the live antenna socket at the back, some of the radio's have live metal box's inside the wooden case. At first I thought this was mad and I am glad this isnt done anymore, then I started to meet people like said avionics tech above.
This got me thinking... Maybe today there is more stupid people around because we have lowered the chances for natural selection
 

LOL

Its OK LG. I was on "that other Forum" for a while and lost interest. Huge double standards.

It's not OK to discuss modifying cars....but perfectly OK to discuss repairing Aircraft electronics

Crazy.

Regards,
tvtech
 
LG wrote:
It is indeed a funny old world.
I doubt that the "recently banned member" is actually working on equipment which will be installed into an aircraft which will fly.
However, it could of course be that he is a completely competent guy who does work on such equipment in a safe and satisfactory manner, but who gets his jollies from winding up other competent guys with his charade of incompetence.

I considered it a possibility that he is actually a "charity case".
He works as a go-fer in a small workshop which actually does repair avionics equipment, and in his dowtime they let him play with scrap equipment in a corner of the workshop. As an extension of this playing he comes on to the internet forums asking questions which the workshop guys cannot be bothered to answer, or more likely he just cannot grasp.


And people still dont understand why I find it so hard to grasp certain rules and procedures! I am a logical thinker and simplistic person, I live in a complex and contradicting world. No wonder I struggle at times to fit in.
Don't worry, it can only get worse as you go through life and gain experience.

A couple of examples from my career.

Many years ago, while working as an Instrument Technician I repaired a temperature controller for a furnace. A simple thing, a thermocouple drove a moving coil meter, a flag on the meter pointer intrupted a lightbeam and a photocell operated a relay to turn off the heater.
The faulty controller was in the workshop, I fixed it, and it was neededback on the furnace asap. So I took it to the furnace.
Now, I could do whatever I liked to that controller while it is in the workshop, but I could not connect it back up to the furnace, oh no, that is an electricians job.
So, along comes the electrician. He only has one hand! He is a mono-dexter!
So I, stand there, holding up the controller, while he deftly inserts the wires into the terminal block and tightens the screws, all done one handed.


Different time, different place, different company.
We had to set up a test rig to simulate a system that was mis-behaving.
Part of this test rig was a number of PCs running our own proprietary software.
At the time we were at best starved of resources (the PCs), so instead of buying a bunch of them (about 5) and making them available for general use in the office when the test was over, you could not imagine the solution which the management dreamed up...

... As it was the Houston (Texas) office who wanted the test done, they would supply the PCs.
As it happened, they had just upgraded their desktop PCs from 386s to 486s (yes it was that long ago), so they boxed up five of the old 386 PCs and sent them to the UK for us to use for the test.
It gets better...
So that we in the UK did not have to pay tax, VAT etc on these PCs, when the test was over, they were put back into the crate and sent back to the USA.

So whether some apparent half wit on some internet site is or is not trying to fix avionics, and what any random internet site considers should not be discussed, be it automotive electronics, avionics or nuclear reactor control systems, is just down in the noise floor of life.

Try not to worry about it.

JimB

An after thought.
Good persons who strive to help the "recently banned member" deserve a place in heaven. (good grief! did I just say that?).
For me, I have posted to help out that person, but never again.
I would not waste my time and effort on such a fools errand.
 
Hi,

I just thought of something that happened to me regarding safety.

Way way back before transistors were popular, we only had tube radios and amplifiers. My interest in electronics back then was not much different than today so i naturally wondered about how they worked. One big difference though is that they used HUGE dc buss voltages. I mean 400 or 500vdc power rails, not plus and minus 15 volts. Needless to say one day in the basement i accidentally touched a 400vdc supply rail (dont remember exactly what i was doing at the time other than just playing around with a tube amplifier). I think it knocked me out for a few seconds, but obviously im still around to tell about it.

The real point of this post though is that way back then we had no forums, we only had electronic magazines (and i dont think i subscribed to one yet at that time), so there was no one to really ask about this stuff. I could have been killed that day, even though there were no forums, so that tells me that forums cant be a cause of danger. If i had a forum at the time i might have been able to ask about that and im sure members would have came back with a thousand cautions about the danger of the 400vdc power rail, and that might have saved me from a very very nasty shock. I got a bad shock and that's just because of my human nature, and that's the way people are.

I can only conclude that forums can help people with regard to safety because people tend to do risky and/or dumb things sometimes mostly because they are not aware of the dangers involved. Forums help people become aware of the dangers and i think that's important.
 
Last edited:



I did think about the charity case idea, for a while it had merit. Then I thought but in that scenario it would mean they had to let him loose with a broom! So I did a search on the net and nowhere can I find question's like the following

1) I have a broom with 600 bristle's and the guy next to me has 500, WHY, why would you need 600 bristles and can you give me 100 examples of where 600 bristle on my broom is better than 500.

2) In the manual for my broom it says it has an attachment point for a duster, can I use the duster instead of the broom when I sweep up? Should I use the 500 bristles or the 600 bristles head? Why do they have dusters on brooms? when would you use the duster instead on the broom? Can you give me 100 examples of when a duster is better than a broom for sweeping

3) The broom tech next to me say's when sweeping a tiled floor you should always sweep from the back to the front, my manager say's to sweep from the front to the back! How do you sweep on a tiled floor? why do you do it that way?
If I use the duster on the broom should i sweep back to front or front to back? The manual dosnt say anything except sweep the foofing floor, Can you give me 100 examples of when you personally would sweep back to front and front to back. On a tiled floor do you use front to back or back to front??? Have you tried this with the duster?

4) We also have a mop, why should I use the broom instead of the mop? Whats the mop for? what advantage does the mop have over the broom when sweeping the floor? I tried sweeping with the mop and it didnt work, why? The tech next to me always uses the mop and it works for him, why didnt it work for me? Why dosnt the mop have a fitting for a duster?


So in the absence of these question's I decided he didnt work somewhere willing to let him loose with a broom. In the end I decided he was a idiot savant with the savant bit missing.

As for brain dead action's


The council who run my School make a huge thing about all the Schools having a healthy eating policy,on the web site it goes to great lengths to explain chips and burgers are outlawed in Schools and only healthy food is offered.
Then the same council sells licenses to 4 burger van type set ups so they can park OUTSIDE my SCHOOL GATES at lunch time to sell burgers and chips to the kids!
 
That would explain alot. Is he still over there? Sometimes I would like to read his stuff for a good chuckle and to remind myself how far I have come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…