I've been through "peer reviews" in the past. But I'll have to say, nothing even vaguely approaching these.
Scary.
The last sentence of the Conclusion, however, does give one pause:
"...Although these results are compatible with the hypothesis that the new particle is the Standard Model Higgs boson, more data are needed to assess its nature in detail."
To me that's saying two things:
1. What was detected (seen, sensed, observed) is not definitive evidence of the existence of the SM Higgs boson and so:
2. "more data" is needed. That's pretty much saying that "We need more time and money to pursue this concept because, frankly, we're just not quite there yet".
Probably one of the most common sentences used at the end of most (if not all) Grant Report documents.
But, isn't that what research is all about? Gotta pay for it somehow.