As Pommie says.
2.4GHz is unusable in many places due to the amount of overlapping systems.
Note that the channel numbers are pretty irrelevant as they are a leftover from early systems.
11g WiFi used four numeric channels as a block and you could just have three systems coexisting in countries with 11 channels, using 1, 6 & 11. (Or four using 1, 5, 9 & 13 in 13 channel countries).
A lot of newer 11n systems use EIGHT channels as a block, 2/3 of the entire band - so it's literally impossible for any two to coexist in range of each other without slowdown and blocking effects.
Then add in non-WiFi 2.4GHz, everything from video senders, microwaves, baby alarms and (in some countries) DECT cordless phones... None of those are visible on WiFi based channel analysers, as the signal format is not recognised by WiFi receivers - but the signals still interfere with or block the WiFi signals.
The basic rule is never use WiFi for any fixed device like a desktop PC or TV etc.
Use wired Ethernet of fast Homeplug, that does not travel outside the house or get interference from other houses..
If you have to use WiFi, use 5GHz where there is vastly more space for systems to coexist without problems.
>end rant< (Retailers pushing WiFi for fixed devices is one of my pet hates, if you've not guessed that!)
I have experienced failures in two or three TP-Link routers supplied to customers - but it's always been the DSL side, not the LAN side; they still work fine when reconfigured as APs, so I don't know how likely a WiFi hardware fault is.
The fact that your system recovers without being shut down to cool seems to make it unlikely