Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All source files are in the Tech-Tools (Parallax) format.
The object code files are identical to Microchip's. You can use
them 'as is' in most any programmer. Also, the (DOS-based)
editor / assembler that produced them is available free HERE.
Your problem well explained in Mondos home page.Its in parallax format.
Code:All source files are in the Tech-Tools (Parallax) format. The object code files are identical to Microchip's. You can use them 'as is' in most any programmer. Also, the (DOS-based) editor / assembler that produced them is available free HERE.
Few projects gives ASM.You must use that object file.But to see the source..........??
They should really exclude that last line of stuff unless they are trying to force their readers to use a stone-age editor or edit the files before they are usable. Assemblers will choke on that line....
....
It's not a killer problem, but it is bad form.
I do not agree to your comments. The author has so kindly offered his codes, and even a suitable assembler for free with his source codes. He also provided a clear explanation of the difference between Microchip's and his version.
Remember this is free stuff, the author has every right to provide his coding in any format convenience to himself.
If you are a linux program writer, can someone blame you for not providing window's EXE in your package?
That's one of the reasons I love Textpad. It will load absolutely any file, even if it ends up displaying gibberish. It's a great editor and even makes a pretty good IDE. Very configureable and a LOT deeper than it first appears.For the record, I also don't like the fact that (some) editors have the annoying habit of refusing to load a file flat-out because it contains a line of control codes.
That's one of the reasons I love Textpad. It will load absolutely any file, even if it ends up displaying gibberish. It's a great editor and even makes a pretty good IDE. Very configureable and a LOT deeper than it first appears.
I used to know emacs (in the 80's). Used it for many years but eventually moved away from it and have never tried it again since.My favourite for about the last 12 years has been Emacs (https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ ) but I understand some people find it a bit intimidating.
Na. Not so many old timer Linux users here.Cue the onslaught of vi posts.
I used to know emacs (in the 80's). Used it for many years but eventually moved away from it and have never tried it again since.
Na. Not so many old timer Linux users here.