The circuit still cannot do anything practical.
Lets study more to make it practical.
Even disregarding impractical resistor values, just the U1C stage is impossible. It's acting as a comparator and the output will not do much other than switch between near positive supply and near negative supply.
Are you confused on the points where R7,R8 and R11 meets together? Their parallel input impedance is not compatible with R10 you think?
Yes, C4 doesn't make sense, but without DC feedback can make sense under circumstances if it's part of an overall feedback loop, e.g. PI controller. But hardly with the given low integrator time constants.
My co-worker said me it has taken from the output. I think the question raise for lower input/output impedance is for lower input voltage.
What maximum voltage you could imagine from such shunt? I am talking about,
**broken link removed**
If its 50mV, then current is 100 amps for 0.5mOhm resistance!
R5 sets a threshold of around 3V on the positive input of U1B.
For the 50mV signal to reach that threshold it needs significant gain. U2 is very low gain and U1A is a unity-gain buffer. The signal can never be high enough to have any effect at U1B; it's output is going to be permanently high so isolated by the diode.
.
I do agree with you here, voltage divider gives nearly 3-4volts. The purpose behind using U1A is to maintain a balance in terms of impedance between U2 and U1B. If you forget about U1A and consider the Common mode signal to pin 6 of U1B, then all responsibility goes to U1B!
Think what U1D is doing here,
* it is a standard inverting Opamp circuit.
* R17 is the input resistor
* R12 and C5 are in parallel ! and both are the feedback
The DC gain is: A = -R12/R17 = -100k/130 = 0.00077. That means a 10V input becomes 0.0077V at the output.
I don't think this is a useful signal range.
Whats your opinion ?
Interesting to see the diode action here. Beside that what CVC is acting here, does it trying to control negative inputs of U1C?