Jani12, I'm not sure of what you are asking. My world was Avionics in the USA, so under the FAA regulations. There any piece of equipment had to be shown to be safe for experimental flight test. So a minimum of lab testing was required. In my case, depending on the equipment type, (e.g. autopilot, flight management, primary flight display) there were FAA regulations called TSO (Technical Standing Order) that were publish for each of the functions the equipment was designed for. These TSO's then pointed at other documents, some were the RTCA (Radio Technical Commission on Avionics), which then may point at specific DO-xxx documents, in my case the DO-160 was environmental tests (shake, bake, emi) requirements. Internally we would determine the minimum tests needed for experimental flight test.
I do not know what the DOT requirements are for vehicles, but they clearly flow down from the USA Code of Federal Regulations (typically part 14).
Are you working as a test engineer, as your list seems to be related to that. If you are working on new electronics, and they are safety related, e.g. EPS electric power steering system, there must be some real qualification testing to ensure it's operation, as well system requirements for what ever level of safety is needed. You don't want a runaway operation that can overpower the driver, and cause a catastrophic event. That's the worry with avionics, so in that world there are three levels of safety for "Safe Flight and Landing", Critical, Essential, Non Essential, and failures were required to be computed per methods developed for the nuclear power industry, of 1 failure per billion hours of operation for critical systems, 1 failure for 10 million hours of operation for essential systems.
Don't know if this is helpful to your question.