As far as the incidents at AAC. stuff like that happens. It wasn't that long ago that there was a minor uprising here at ETO.
Someone may have tipped EM off to that thread two years ago Matt. I don't know if anyone tipped off jrap or EETechMedia over there.
They would have to notice a group of disgruntled members with a moderators actions for them to take action. That's human nature, being reactive to external stimuli.
The moderators, no matter which forum, are limited in their power and abuse of power, should be reported as they represent the forum owners at this level.
I'll leave you with this Matt,
Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.
--- John Stuart Mill, in an address at the University of St. Andrew (1 February 1867)
I wouldn't want to bastardize Mill's statement to make it fit moderators, but you get the drift.
Or, one can just change their AAC avatar to a screne capture of...Those voting with there feet should drop a line or an open message to the ownership on why they are departing.
I've been on forums where some had poor vocabulary skills, still mustered enough members to get someone banned.
Those voting with there feet should drop a line or an open message to the ownership on why they are departing
"Power trip" is a good descriptor; the mods there seem obsessed with control, rank, status and enforcing rigid adherence to arbitrary rules. This was my final post there; I suspect the same fate will befall AAC as befell the others, and I've no desire to stick around and watch it happen.If I were the forum owner, I wouldn't need my members to inform me when my mods are on a power trip, I'd already know, they'd already be chastised or replaced.
Glad to see you here! And your post was prophetic, here we are."Power trip" is a good descriptor; the mods there seem obsessed with control, rank, status and enforcing rigid adherence to arbitrary rules. This was my final post there; I suspect the same fate will befall AAC as befell the others, and I've no desire to stick around and watch it happen.
The final straw for me was when the moderators started deleting posts that criticized RK and his silly questions, or editing them to remove content they deemed "offensive" or "bullying," without having the courtesy of informing the poster. Not acceptable.
...The final straw for me was when the moderators started deleting posts ... or editing them to remove content they deemed "offensive" or "bullying," without having the courtesy of informing the poster. Not acceptable.
The final straw for me was when the moderators started deleting posts that criticized RK and his silly questions, or editing them to remove content they deemed "offensive" or "bullying," without having the courtesy of informing the poster. Not acceptable.
I distinctly remember that post; I loaded the page just seconds after you posted it, and a minute later when I went to click the "LIKE" button, I got an error message because it was gone.One day, after almost a dozen posts from RK in one day, all of them questions that my 10y/o would agree were stupid, I posted "Normally I just ignore stupid, but your flavor of stupid is particularly irritating. Can you start making an effort to answer your own questions instead of posting every thought you have that ends in a question mark?" That post was deleted within 60sec.
I never thought of him as a troll, at least not in the sense of him being deliberately, calculatingly disruptive for the purpose of causing consternation among the rest of us members; I considered him a lazy, ignorant, unmotivated, coddled dolt who no doubt had spent his entire 24 years pampered by the adults in his life with no demands ever made on him, and he expected us to do the same.He was a troll, and they defended him at the expense of the community. I think that the reason for playing it that way was that it gave them/him (her?) so many more opportunities to swing the hammer of domination at so many more targets. Much more gratifying for someone who craves power and gets off on enforcement of it.
I never thought of him as a troll, at least not in the sense of him being deliberately, calculatingly disruptive for the purpose of causing consternation among the rest of us members; I considered him a lazy, ignorant, unmotivated, coddled dolt who no doubt had spent his entire 24 years pampered by the adults in his life with no demands ever made on him, and he expected us to do the same.
I considered him as you described for a while, but there was a point at which it seemed just "too much". I guess the opposite of "too good to be true"
I wonder if he made an appearance over here, and how he was handled if so.
I recall someone saying that he used to be here, but was banned for the same kind of behavior that was causing all the turmoil over on AAC.I wonder if he made an appearance over here, and how he was handled if so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?