Sure thing.
As for a real test paired with a synthetic test result, I'll place more on the real test, all be it sometimes slower, whilst some prefer the simulated, because.. it's done by an omnipotent being.. The computer.. For the speed of processing power, benefit, but as for the person using it, then it becomes questionable. Many greatly trust computers too greatly. (I feel odly like I'm restating an obvious here) .
As for the parallel test, one wonders, a new implemented concept of computerized neurocognitive test vs neuropsychological, RBANS, for terms use of Chemotherapy to determine chemobrain? And biosystems chemistry of resulting levels of requirement possibly didn't hold up to perception via per parameter case example. The new system was incomplete?
: Odd thoughts :
The concept in thought from some years ago, 90's perhaps further (when I caught on about this in school), I recall a method towards a business sense that the persona of appearance and capability was the method, meaning that a person with skill would not alone be adequate, best at following a trend to appear more appealing by character and skill set. In a term that I find works best and yet is not fair to any, "sales pitch" regiment to a persons abilities, charismatic approach. However now, I only in most see more towards the sales pitch rather than the skill set. In term I do not completely feel the majority in problems leading to any one person, business, world (an entirety of self), rather the process of demand of what is being made that has led to the strife of the here and now, I don't care how it works as long as it works so we can sell it! This is familiar, and over time will lead to some not caring about the outcome when once cared to the point of wanting to learn any field or retain what is when having to deal with types that are pushing for grandeur. Any can still be charismatic and have skill, tho that's not as common now, or how it seems at least. Those that I can barley find near home, now hide themselves away from society, none of them state why other than a sudden change of subject in conversation.
Solutions regardless, often to lead back to their inevitable beginnings. And the cost in initial saving is rarely enough to cover the disasters that do get noticed over the ones that are never known.
And yes, sometimes.... no, more times now, that it does take a toll to an point that the effect results in a note that can not be discarded to gain results in a change, there are many cases that lead to one another in strings that continue on and on to others.
It takes a disaster to result change. : Edit : knowing better than this.. It dosen't all ways have to result a disaster to result in change, we still have a existing / functioning society.
Who knows, it might just more of the human code beginning to appear thanks to the ability to connect via internet and social. Or something close.
Often seeing whats been going on around us, to only realize... It's in the same room with us
. This line I refer to two sitting on a park bench texting one another.