High-voltage direct current (HVDC) technology offers more efficient bulk power transfer over long distances compared to alternating current (AC) systems.
I asked further, and apparently there are undersea power cables from the Continent to the UK, and these have to be DC because they are under sea water?
Yes exactly. AC cables have limitations when it comes to length because of extreme power factors over long distances, and DC cables is usually a better choice.
Another thing about long distances DC cables in sea bottom is that you need only one conductor, the sea water itself works as a huge earth conductor. Not without any losses of course - in each end of such cables there is huge underwater electrodes, and when running full capacity it may look like the sea just outside land/beach are boiling.
Yes exactly. AC cables have limitations when it comes to length because of extreme power factors over long distances, and DC cables is usually a better choice.
Another thing about long distances DC cables in sea bottom is that you need only one conductor, the sea water itself works as a huge earth conductor. Not without any losses of course - in each end of such cables there is huge underwater electrodes, and when running full capacity it may look like the sea just outside land/beach are boiling.
I asked further, and apparently there are undersea power cables from the Continent to the UK, and these have to be DC because they are under sea water?.
Not so much AC vs DC but that is the advice given for DC wiring.
How many miles of what size DC cable do they use to transfer worth while amount of current from the Continent to the UK?
Ha ha, Sorry. That was an exaggeration. “00” battery cable would be plenty to crank a 2000 horse power, 16 cylinder diesel engine. It is just that when people ask about running a light load over a distance, they get advice to use cost prohibitive, overkill wiring.