Nigel Goodwin Super Moderator Most Helpful Member Jul 15, 2023 #21 crutschow said: So I see no where in that circuit that any significant reverse bias voltage is being applied to a base-emitter junction. Click to expand... No, or any 6V forward bias either. However, I'm not happy with sticking 40mA permanently down the base of Q4, if for any reason the circuit doesn't oscillate Q4 won't last very long. As opposed to being 'fail save' it's more 'fail catastrophe'
crutschow said: So I see no where in that circuit that any significant reverse bias voltage is being applied to a base-emitter junction. Click to expand... No, or any 6V forward bias either. However, I'm not happy with sticking 40mA permanently down the base of Q4, if for any reason the circuit doesn't oscillate Q4 won't last very long. As opposed to being 'fail save' it's more 'fail catastrophe'
Nigel Goodwin Super Moderator Most Helpful Member Jul 15, 2023 #23 Lightium said: So the circuit checks out ok? Thanks for the help and tip. Click to expand... I didn't say that - it seems bizarrely designed, with highly bizarre values - but there's no '6V on a base' anywhere.
Lightium said: So the circuit checks out ok? Thanks for the help and tip. Click to expand... I didn't say that - it seems bizarrely designed, with highly bizarre values - but there's no '6V on a base' anywhere.
Lightium Active Member Jul 15, 2023 #24 Yeh, I learned this new trick where I can measure the average and rms voltages and it looked good to me.
Yeh, I learned this new trick where I can measure the average and rms voltages and it looked good to me.
Lightium Active Member Jul 15, 2023 #25 II understand that it's bizarre. I'll will take more time with it before building.