No, there is several wrong points in all this.
Distinguish should be done in few steps:
1. OP's level of knowledge
2. What he want to make
3. What he did so far
If somebody says: "I'm a high school student just started with electronic and I want to do this - here is what I done. Is it good? Can it be better?"
What could to say to him?
1. "This is a completely garbage! Just give up from this!". Of course there is much better way than beginner just done. As a bonus, it will never ask a thing again.
2. "I'm an experience EE, this could be done much simplest using <using some parts and approaches OP probably never hear about>". Of course there is much better way.
3. "This is fine for beginning, just consider using another approach using parts you are familiar with or involve some new usually used" Etc. then OP will not get lost in experience way of solving the problem.
That is not true.
If OP is willing to learn and showing it's improving in existed circuit adding more parts he is familiar with or learned about in the meanwhile extending complexity, eventually will see that more and more problems are created and start all over. This is important part of learning process, learning exactly why that approach is not good and what actually get wrong, in which case will never make that mistake again - ever! Period.
Instead, it will carefully see what is the assignment, what is the best approach based on what he already know and learn more about parts he is not familiar with, research further to completely understand all happens behind the circuit, what can go wrong if replace or missing some part, etc.
OP which is the student from beginning ask you: "How I can do this?".
If you gave him circuit 100% solve the problem, it will return with the same question again and again, learning nothing, except that other can make his own home work.
If you are retired EE, you are full of experience someone just beginning may hardly understand why that is just the simplest approach to do. Otherwise, you will lost a lot of time explaining cascade theories of operation.
That is simply why experimenting and learning on it's own mistakes is invaluable experience.
And that is the whole point.