SwingeyP
Member
Hi Eric,
I have asked Vladimir for a pointer as to whats going on with that first byte in the IEEE 754 conversion. He replied that he couldn't see a problem. I have explained exactly what I feel the problem is and sent him some code. I await a further reply. I have been messing around trying some way of just using LONG variables and maybe loosing a little resolution but this led to nothing
Here is the code as it stands at the moment. There's a lot of tidying up to do. I can see lots of places where I could get rid of a few variables but for now it's working (almost).
The current problem is a real show stopper for me. I'm not sure how I can get round it. Everything is working as it should if I could just get that SINGLE to be the same value as a LONG.
Cheers - Paul
I have asked Vladimir for a pointer as to whats going on with that first byte in the IEEE 754 conversion. He replied that he couldn't see a problem. I have explained exactly what I feel the problem is and sent him some code. I await a further reply. I have been messing around trying some way of just using LONG variables and maybe loosing a little resolution but this led to nothing
Here is the code as it stands at the moment. There's a lot of tidying up to do. I can see lots of places where I could get rid of a few variables but for now it's working (almost).
The current problem is a real show stopper for me. I'm not sure how I can get round it. Everything is working as it should if I could just get that SINGLE to be the same value as a LONG.
Cheers - Paul