You still dont catch it huh?
This thread is in the area of sea level changes and so I asked a simple question about if anyone had any places that they may want to recommend as to where would be an interesting place to visit and go diving at.
Figure it out yet?
Its in bold print and large letters in the last sentence. What your made of it from there had nothing to do with this thread in any exacting specifics.
What I have gotten from what I have read up on this subject since that post has suggested that given the estimated sea level rises since the last ice age there should be many. Unfortunately the older ones are what get the publicity not the more recent ones. I want to see the more recent and less known ruins.
For my next post, see the part that starts out with an 'IF' and is in bold print and that ends in a question mark and a confused face. That means I am not sure and I am in a way asking for someone to confirm it.
You picked it up and ran with it so I said this in the next post.
What I am referring to is 'a measurable human history time frame' is that the 5000 year and sooner time frame is considered somewhat recorded historical time and that in the last 5000 years there has also been a roughly 100 foot sea level rise. If that change in level over that time period is factored against the present geological data relating to the last ice age you get a fairly accurate correlation. So in 5000 years and 100 feet of sea level change there will be some cities and coastal dwellings that got submerged.
I never implied that I knew of any and have yet to imply that I personally know of any still!
Since you are apparently needing it spelled out further, I am planning to make a trip over seas this winter, if possible, and am a amateur scuba diver that is only certified to 100 feet depth. Personally I prefer 50 feet or less! Thats it, its a general comment question. Not a hypothesis, theory, or scientifically based anything and I have never claimed it to be one!
What you made of it from there is where the thread went. I lead nothing into or out of it.
I am not a geologist, scientist, researcher, ecologist or even a very good diver or writer and I make no claims to be any of these. My writing skills are marginal and through this whole thread all I have been doing is cross checking other peoples claims and information and posting links and quotes from sources I considered to be of fair and unbiased in their research so that others may have reference points to work with and thus can make their own decisions when and if anyone does produce any human induced global warming information.
I have yet to decide myself if global warming is real or not.
What you and Brownout have posted so far in your defense for global warming is less than convincing being it is easy even for someone like me to cross check it and debunk it or disprove its validity when compared to the global net gain values which are what the whole planet works on. .03% of something is not the whole something.
SO get cracking already! My verdict is still out! Produce this undeniable evidence global warming caused by us humans you claim to have. You believe it so let us see what made you so convinced and sure.
We are waiting and I will be checking your work too!
So POOP or get off the pot already!
This thread is in the area of sea level changes and so I asked a simple question about if anyone had any places that they may want to recommend as to where would be an interesting place to visit and go diving at.
Figure it out yet?
Its in bold print and large letters in the last sentence. What your made of it from there had nothing to do with this thread in any exacting specifics.
What I have gotten from what I have read up on this subject since that post has suggested that given the estimated sea level rises since the last ice age there should be many. Unfortunately the older ones are what get the publicity not the more recent ones. I want to see the more recent and less known ruins.
For my next post, see the part that starts out with an 'IF' and is in bold print and that ends in a question mark and a confused face. That means I am not sure and I am in a way asking for someone to confirm it.
You picked it up and ran with it so I said this in the next post.
What I am referring to is 'a measurable human history time frame' is that the 5000 year and sooner time frame is considered somewhat recorded historical time and that in the last 5000 years there has also been a roughly 100 foot sea level rise. If that change in level over that time period is factored against the present geological data relating to the last ice age you get a fairly accurate correlation. So in 5000 years and 100 feet of sea level change there will be some cities and coastal dwellings that got submerged.
I never implied that I knew of any and have yet to imply that I personally know of any still!
Since you are apparently needing it spelled out further, I am planning to make a trip over seas this winter, if possible, and am a amateur scuba diver that is only certified to 100 feet depth. Personally I prefer 50 feet or less! Thats it, its a general comment question. Not a hypothesis, theory, or scientifically based anything and I have never claimed it to be one!
What you made of it from there is where the thread went. I lead nothing into or out of it.
I am not a geologist, scientist, researcher, ecologist or even a very good diver or writer and I make no claims to be any of these. My writing skills are marginal and through this whole thread all I have been doing is cross checking other peoples claims and information and posting links and quotes from sources I considered to be of fair and unbiased in their research so that others may have reference points to work with and thus can make their own decisions when and if anyone does produce any human induced global warming information.
I have yet to decide myself if global warming is real or not.
What you and Brownout have posted so far in your defense for global warming is less than convincing being it is easy even for someone like me to cross check it and debunk it or disprove its validity when compared to the global net gain values which are what the whole planet works on. .03% of something is not the whole something.
SO get cracking already! My verdict is still out! Produce this undeniable evidence global warming caused by us humans you claim to have. You believe it so let us see what made you so convinced and sure.
We are waiting and I will be checking your work too!
So POOP or get off the pot already!
Last edited: