Then either the collector/emitter values are the wrong way round or the transistor is.I got 1.65V at the emittor, 11.41V base and 12.04V collector of Q3.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then either the collector/emitter values are the wrong way round or the transistor is.I got 1.65V at the emittor, 11.41V base and 12.04V collector of Q3.
We've all been there. Datasheets can be ambiguous too. It's not always clear whether they show a top view or bottom view of a component.I was looking at this backwards
The alarm module is not on the same board as the pair of PDMs. Would it be a good test to send 2V to the alarm module with a wall wart if I can find the right one in my junkpile?If the alarm sounds while the collector (pin 3) voltage is <~2V then the fault is in the alarm module or the connections to it.
Should this resistor be permanentEdit: In the alarm module, try connecting a ~10k-33k resistor from Q1 base to ground. That will reduce the sensitivity of the alarm to spurious voltage on Q1 base.
Depending on the particular red LEDs you have in the alarm module 4.5V (3 AA cells in series) should sound the alarm, 3V (2 cells) might, but 1.5V shouldn't. All channels of the alarm module should respond in the same way; any odd man out is your suspect.Would it be a good test to send 2V to the alarm module
By rights it should, so that there is a pull-down to prevent Q1 base 'floating'. That doesn't happen in simulation but could in the real world. An oversight on my part .Should this resistor be permanent
Never!is it time to throw in the towel?
Never!
Not in this case, fortunately. If the trip test on PDM13 works then the IC in PDM13 is ok.Did I likely damage something with the wrong hookup?
That's because the fat cap C5 takes time to discharge via the LED.If a pump is not plugged in, that pump's LED glows for awhile after the power is turned off.
As I mentioned previously, Rsense in the PDM is key to PDM and FSM operation. It's only 0.22 Ohms, so even a few milliohms extra resistance (e.g. due to solder joints and wiring lengths) can be significant. On top of that there are component tolerances (10%?), pump current profile (different from the old pumps, and it's unknown exactly what the new controllers do to run the pumps up to speed) and pump build tolerances conspiring against you; so it's not too surprising.And an odd thing, some PDMs do better with some new controllers/new pumps than others in terms of setting off the alarm and the 'flick'
If the FSM is on the bench and disconnected from all else, give it 12V on both the '12V' terminal and the Vt input. Then connect the Isense input to ground ('Fault' output should rise to ~12V in ~4 sec) or to a +1.2V or +1.5V source ('Fault' output should drop to <~1V).If I give the FSM 12V and ground, could the ground Isense test be used on the bench?
I've lost track of what's where . Is channel 13 in the wave system or in the tidal system? Did it have its Vt input high (12V) during the test? (If Vt is low the FSM channel is disabled by design). I should have asked that question in post #2351 .Last night when I did the ground Isense test on channel 13 with everything hooked up I got no alarm.