Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't you, gary350 have a schematic for a 1960's era seismograph based on an LM741 with LDR AGC and logarithmic response?Read subject line, It was originally about, LED Leads & Transistor Leads are rusting away??? Several people changes the subject to, Chinese rice batteries, copyright, battery label, PC boards, radio shack, types of batteries, steel wires, solder, moisture, etc & it want crazy after that. LOL. No 1 has mentioned earth quakes yet?
Read subject line, It was originally about, LED Leads & Transistor Leads are rusting away??? Several people changes the subject to, Chinese rice batteries, copyright, battery label, PC boards, radio shack, types of batteries, steel wires, solder, moisture, etc & it want crazy after that. LOL. No 1 has mentioned earth quakes yet?
Don't you, gary350 have a schematic for a 1960's era seismograph based on an LM741 with LDR AGC and logarithmic response?
I'm having a lot of trouble following this tread. I thought it was about flashing LEDs but then it was about welding with arteries but now microswitches? I'm so confused.
I hope Honeywell went out of business.
We buy what we can afford, we are retired, live on month SS check & eat cat food. Can't afford any Union made stuff.The earthquakes and rusting happen when you cheap buy Chinese junk.
Don't you, gary350 have a schematic for a 1960's era seismograph based on an LM741 with LDR AGC and logarithmic response?
You mean series?...2 old batteries in parallel are 2.7v...
You mean series?
I suggest throwing a 100k VR in there instead of the fixed 56k resistor and adjust to find the threshold.
Two LEDs each on 50% of the time still has the same current draw as one LED on 100% of the time.... (which has been mentioned in this tread and the similar ones that have proceeded it.)
And, asking for a friend, (Ha) the other one blinks 970 mSec?That is why I blink each LED on my LED chasers for only 30 milli-seconds (long enough to see its full brightness) to save on battery power.
Nope, I said each LED for 30 milli-seconds. Thanks for the head banging animation, it is a good one.And, asking for a friend, (Ha) the other one blinks 970 mSec?
Be careful, reviews of Sunbeam "'Super Heavy Duty" (old carbon-zinc type) batteries from China say that they leak chemicals, produce very low power and are not worth it.
The 56k value for the base resistor of the power-switching transistor on the LED Blinker circuit is too high. If the batteries are brand new alkaline then the 3.2V supply minus the 0.7V base-emitter voltage drop produces a base current of only (3.2V - 0.7V)/56k= 45uA. The datasheet for the 2N3904 and nearly every other little transistor says that for it to saturate as a switch then its collector current shall be 10 times the base current. Then it will conduct well for a collector current of only 0.45mA which would cause the LEDs to be very dim.
The circuit has 470 ohms in series with each LED. Then the switched voltage is 3V which is turned on with the multivibrator driving a 2V red LED drawing a current of (3V - 0.2V - 2V)/470 ohms= 1.7mA (very dim LEDs). So the base current should be 1.7mA/10= 0.17mA and the base resistor value should be (3.2V- 0.7V)/0.17mA= 14.7k. Since the resistor value of 56k is too high then the switched voltage of only 2.4V shows the the transistor is not saturated.
Since the currents are very low, I think the resistor values were designed for the circuit to be powered from 9V to 12V.
Be careful, reviews of Sunbeam "'Super Heavy Duty" (old carbon-zinc type) batteries from China say that they leak chemicals, produce very low power and are not worth it.
The 56k value for the base resistor of the power-switching transistor on the LED Blinker circuit is too high. If the batteries are brand new alkaline then the 3.2V supply minus the 0.7V base-emitter voltage drop produces a base current of only (3.2V - 0.7V)/56k= 45uA. The datasheet for the 2N3904 and nearly every other little transistor says that for it to saturate as a switch then its collector current shall be 10 times the base current. Then it will conduct well for a collector current of only 0.45mA which would cause the LEDs to be very dim.
The circuit has 470 ohms in series with each LED. Then the switched voltage is 3V which is turned on with the multivibrator driving a 2V red LED drawing a current of (3V - 0.2V - 2V)/470 ohms= 1.7mA (very dim LEDs). So the base current should be 1.7mA/10= 0.17mA and the base resistor value should be (3.2V- 0.7V)/0.17mA= 14.7k. Since the resistor value of 56k is too high then the switched voltage of only 2.4V shows the the transistor is not saturated.
Since the currents are very low, I think the resistor values were designed for the circuit to be powered from 9V to 12V.