copernicus1234
Member
My question is: do equations 2 and 3 represent vector field EM transverse waves? Also, you didn't state anything about Einstein's relativity, as regards to Maxwell's equations. Einstein uses Maxwell's equations, and Lorentz's daily and earthly motions. We're just having such a fantastic time (t) with Maxwell and Lorentz earth's daily and yearly motions (ronsimpson in Astronomy). Also, did you know that Einstein stated the EM field is the ether, in 1910. So, back to the beginning, where your correction is based on,
E = Ey j = (Eo cos(kx - wt) j) j
that can be written as:
E = Ey = Eo cos(kx - wt) j.............1
since the EM wave equations are being used to represent an EM wave of light.
(Note: there is a slight modification requried in the above figure since the EM transverse wave is propagating in the z direction.)
The purposed of the expansion method is the derivation a transverse wave since Ey and Ez are being used in the elimination process of the expansion of Maxwell's equations. Now, if your equation
E = Ey j = (Eo cos(kx - wt) j) j..........2
can be written as
E = Ey = Eo cos(kx - wt) j ..................3
and also to form,
B = By = Bo cos(kx - wt) k.................4
the electric field component would oscillate in the y direction and the magnetic field would oscillate in the z direction which produces a problem. But first, if we simply look at Maxwell equations,
equ 5a,b and equ 6a,b........
We can see that for the EM transverse wave equations of light, that are derived using Maxwell's curl equations, produces a serious dillema since the electric and magnetic field vectors are on different sides of Maxwell's curl equations (equ 5b and 6b); consequently, the electric and magnetic field vectors are separated by an equals sign (=) yet the electric and magnetic field vectors are pointing in different directions. The electric field vector, of the electric transverse wave equation (equ 3) is pointing in the y direction, during its oscillation, and the magnetic field vector (equ 4) is pointing in the z direction; therefore, for the derivation of the EM transverse wave equations of light results in this extremely problematic relationship that 150 years of Maxwell's EM theory of light, which is an extremely short period of time, in regards to physics theory, is now showing up.
Hey, ronsimpson, did you know that Newton stoled the derivative and the integral from Leibniz since Newton published Principia, in 1687; whereas, Leibniz published his paper on the derivative, in 1684, and the paper that included the integral symbol, in 1886 which proves Newton is a thief.
E = Ey j = (Eo cos(kx - wt) j) j
that can be written as:
E = Ey = Eo cos(kx - wt) j.............1
since the EM wave equations are being used to represent an EM wave of light.
(Note: there is a slight modification requried in the above figure since the EM transverse wave is propagating in the z direction.)
The purposed of the expansion method is the derivation a transverse wave since Ey and Ez are being used in the elimination process of the expansion of Maxwell's equations. Now, if your equation
E = Ey j = (Eo cos(kx - wt) j) j..........2
can be written as
E = Ey = Eo cos(kx - wt) j ..................3
and also to form,
B = By = Bo cos(kx - wt) k.................4
the electric field component would oscillate in the y direction and the magnetic field would oscillate in the z direction which produces a problem. But first, if we simply look at Maxwell equations,
equ 5a,b and equ 6a,b........
We can see that for the EM transverse wave equations of light, that are derived using Maxwell's curl equations, produces a serious dillema since the electric and magnetic field vectors are on different sides of Maxwell's curl equations (equ 5b and 6b); consequently, the electric and magnetic field vectors are separated by an equals sign (=) yet the electric and magnetic field vectors are pointing in different directions. The electric field vector, of the electric transverse wave equation (equ 3) is pointing in the y direction, during its oscillation, and the magnetic field vector (equ 4) is pointing in the z direction; therefore, for the derivation of the EM transverse wave equations of light results in this extremely problematic relationship that 150 years of Maxwell's EM theory of light, which is an extremely short period of time, in regards to physics theory, is now showing up.
Hey, ronsimpson, did you know that Newton stoled the derivative and the integral from Leibniz since Newton published Principia, in 1687; whereas, Leibniz published his paper on the derivative, in 1684, and the paper that included the integral symbol, in 1886 which proves Newton is a thief.
Last edited: