upand_at_them
Active Member
@Mike - K8LH Have you programmed more than 64K into the 18F27Q43? The device file for PICKitMinus has the wrong program size (64K instead of 128K) for this chip (and others a well).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They stopped distributing the .dat file a number of versions ago... now you get it when you purchase the PicKitPlus software.The PICKitPlus github seems to have found this out a couple days ago, but I wasn't able to find the latest device file on their github...It wasn't obvious to me anyway.
Which is interesting as I haven't had an updated dat file for ages - I think you only get them for the first 12 months (updates to the main software were only for the first 12 months when I bought it).now you get it when you purchase the PicKitPlus software.
Yep. Their website says "parts database updates for one year."Which is interesting as I haven't had an updated dat file for ages - I think you only get them for the first 12 months (updates to the main software were only for the first 12 months when I bought it).
Problem being, when I bought the software, the updated DAT files were listed as always being freely available to purchasers - not a big hassle as I don't use or have a need for the "latest and greatest " in the PIC line.Yep. Their website says "parts database updates for one year."
That's why they have a VERY long license agreement that nobody ever reads.the updated DAT files were listed as always being freely available to purchasers
Problem being, when I bought the software, the updated DAT files were listed as always being freely available to purchasers
I do note they are still saying that the DAT files are available free from the their Github page according to their FAQ page - could get them in a spot of bother if that is no longer the case.We provide one year software support to resolve issues in the software. You can obtain a renewed license in subsequent years by repurchasing a license.
I think the problem with PKminus may be that they were getting the device files from PKplus? Somebody will have to add new devices. I don't mind doing it for chips that I use, but I can tell you...it is time-consuming and mind-numbing when new scripts have to be written.although I would be more inclined to give PKminus a go.
Yup.I think the problem with PKminus may be that they were getting the device files from PKplus?
I can imagine. Plus, then you end up with the same "dat file free-for-all" that the PK2 had when different folks were adding different devices to the same base. You never really knew what files supported what.but I can tell you...it is time-consuming and mind-numbing when new scripts have to be written.