Let the dolphins decide this issue.... they're supposedly wiser than humans anyways!
Let the dolphins decide this issue.... they're supposedly wiser than humans anyways!
In my opinion, those ships were about to dock at in Iraeli territory without authorisation.
At present, there is no country called "Palestine".
Those aboard the ships knew it. There were professional protesters aboard.
About the attitude "my country, right or wrong". Those are jingoist words used by some Americans during the Vietnam war, along with "America, love it or leave it". You should know the difference between the 3 levels of loyalty: Patriot, Nationalist, and Jingoist.
Don't go saying that too much or a dolphin might be the next one in the whitehouse, who knows that dolphin would do a heap better than any other big wig the US has ever had in power.......
Ummm lemme guess..... Obama's mother-in-law or maybe his wife?Guess who has the power in the Withehouse?
Ummm lemme guess..... Obama's mother-in-law or maybe his wife?
Unfortunately thats true the Jews took their land off them and ever since they are considered the illegal infidels by the legal land owners. It was on the radio news where a senior female American spokesperson made the comment ' the jews should get the hell out of Palestine and go back to Poland and Germany and leave the rightfull people to their own land'
For that comment she was banned from speaking in public again
so much for FREE SPEECH.....
If so they are just spokeswomen. They're being told by jewish Americans what they have to say!
Israel behaves like a motherless spoiled child and the world watches that bad behaviour without calling that child to orderly behaviour!
The world isn't being threatened by the "yellow danger". It's being threatened by a a maroding gang of utmost criminal elements having established their "territory" on stolen land having made others to steal it for them!
Boncuk
Well, technically she resigned, but we can pretty much surmise that she was coheirced into it (a.k.a. Your fired, you old bat!)BTW, she hasn't been banned from speaking. She was fired from her job as a journalist. She had been a member of the Whitehouse press corps for 50 years and played hardball with every US persident going back to Kennedy.
there was once another German who had similar views to you about the jews...................and as for establishing teretory on stolen land the same German did exactly that with a number of countries in europe.
but i would guess you view that as perfectly fine, afterall he was only trying to eradicate the nasty jews from the world!! wasnt like he was trying to hurt decent people is it
there was once another German who had similar views to you about the jews...................[/QOUTE]
Sorry, but you obviously haven't payed enough attention during history lessons. The person you're talking about is obviously Adolf Hitler, who was Austrian. He just used a tiny gap in the laws of "republic of Weimar" to become leader in Germany.
As every political leader he had to create an "enemy picture" during a crisis (depression).
That of George W. Bush was that of Saddam Hussein who he accused to possess chemical mass destruction weapons and started a war for that reason - with the result that none of those weapons were ever found in Iraq - but thousands of brave men killed.
and as for establishing teretory on stolen land the same German did exactly that with a number of countries in europe.
I guess there is a slight difference between having a country conquer land instead of having it taken away by friends and get it "served on a silver platter". They didn't even have to fight for it!
but i would guess you view that as perfectly fine, afterall he was only trying to eradicate the nasty jews from the world!! wasnt like he was trying to hurt decent people is it
Travelling through arabic countries as German you would certainly be confronted with the question: "Why didn't Germans finish them up all?" Even in Thailand I get to hear on occasion: "Hitler good, German good, why not kill all Jews?"
I admit that it was a crime killing Jews during WWII, but you should admit that it is a crime entering ships in international waters and kill persons on board of those ships.
The Vietnam debacle was no declared war. What do you suggest to call it?
Boncuk
What I heard from the people who where there is that Saddam had everything in place to produce chemical weapons. All the equipment and supplies were at hand. I expect this was not made public because a debate over intent would have been no better then not finding them at all.Boncuk said:That of George W. Bush was that of Saddam Hussein who he accused to possess chemical mass destruction weapons and started a war for that reason - with the result that none of those weapons were ever found in Iraq - but thousands of brave men killed.
Only the US congress can declare war. It is an unpopular thing to do so we have had no "declared" wars since WWII.The Vietnam debacle was no declared war.
Doesn't look like you're going in the right direction here, dude. No offense, I'm just as opposed as anyone towards the killing of Jews those days as much as killing anybody unjustifiably. Since we are already on this topic, the cruelty of the world towards Jews back in those days can't doesn't mean that Jews can come to people's land and take over the territory because "the world has been cruel to us, so you should tolerate a bit of nonsense from us too, shouldn't you?.
I guess there is a slight difference between having a country conquer land instead of having it taken away by friends and get it "served on a silver platter". They didn't even have to fight for it!
actualy i havnt commented on what israel have done!! the reason i havnt is i dont belive its right to comment on something our own countries have been guilty of themselves, it seems kind of odd that its ok to criticise what another nation does yet be ok about your own country doing it.
ah i see so if israel conqured them it would be ok then?? i thought they had tried that and got blasted for it???
First you need to know that the American Indians displaced by settlers did the same to the people who were here prior to them.the examples i gave were america where they took over and nearly made the native americans exstinct!! even today the natives are treated like second class people in there own country...
First you need to know that the American Indians displaced by settlers did the same to the people who were here prior to them.
Historically, conquered people have been exterminated, displaced, or absorbed into the conquering population. For whatever reason or motivation the remaining Indians were given (crappy) land and money in the US. Some payments continue to this day. .
Does history give any country the right to be wrong ?
I agree. The current oil problem is driven by greed. The people making easy money buying oil want it to continue. As I understand it the US had discovered enough oil to supply its own needs. But it is more profitable (who?) to continue with the imports.no history dosnt give a country the right the do wrong but i also dont agree with the DO as SAY NOT as i DO mentality eigther. personaly i think the middle east should be left to sort itself out but thats unlikely as long as we are so relient oil
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?