No current limiter resistor is needed in that position. The base current into the Darlington emitter-follower is self limiting...
Where did you get this rubbish from ?????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No current limiter resistor is needed in that position. The base current into the Darlington emitter-follower is self limiting...
The rubbish is coming from you.Where did you get this rubbish from ?????
So you are welcome to redesign it, Colin... But be aware, your design will be critiqued...How does U2 (an LM339) drive an NPN transistor without a pull-up resistor?
The 2k7 is not needed. U2 is fighting against the 2k7. The circuit is just badly designed.
This is the second fault with the circuit.
U2 has an open-collector output. It needs a pullup to drive the base of the NPN transistor; that is the function of the 2k7 resistor.The 2k7 is not needed. U2 is fighting against the 2k7. The circuit is just badly designed.
This is the second fault with the circuit.
Connecting the collector of the first transistor in the super-alpha arrangement to the collector of the output transistor means the output transistor cannot turn ON fully...
Tony, Q1 ('3055) is not saturated, so your analysis doesn't work. The base current of Q3 doesn't depend on the comparitor at all!
Look at the predicted voltages/currents in this simplified circuit with the motor switch on.
Note V(c)-V(e)=~0.75V.
Note the current in R3 = ~4mA
Note that Q1 would be dissipating only about 3/4W.
This sim was done with the nominal β for both Q3(300) and Q1(360). I reduced β to 50 for both Q3 and Q1 and the voltages/currents changed hardly at all.
View attachment 95134