Take up Chinese https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Chinese
While I am fascinated by all things Chinese: people, country, food, art, I am radically opposed to the pictographic alphabet. While it looks attractive, because of its irrational and non expansive nature, it is very difficult to learn and thus is a hindrance to the Chinese people, and others who would like to learn their language. For example you hear of Chinese typewriters with 4, 000, or more, keys. To a lesser degree Roman numerals are also a hindrance.
Hey, I can write script forward, backward, and mirror image forward and backwards. The weird part, it effortless, if you don't think about it. All I have to do is start correctly. With practice, I make fewer mistakes. I got bored in glass one day. So, I could write "Happy Holidays" on the inside of a window with spray snow and it will turn out correctly when read from the outside.
That is amazing and something I just could not imagine being able to do. It is a natural born talent you have and I would say nothing more
I've been told I have some characteristics of Asberger's Syndrome, but not enough for a dx. Things that are important to me are not important to others: e.g. Shoveling a path across the 12" of snow on the grass for the mailman or shoveling snow in the curb for drainage reasons. Why? I've seen what can happen under the right conditions. The storm drains handle melting snow too. Reasons seem to be wrong to other people. e.g. The boss wants to make an impression by checking off things that are done. I, on the other hand, want to have want to have the next unstarted phase of the project started. The stuff that I know will work without complications, I leave to last. In reality, I should have set the boss take the fall for any problems.
Putting labels on people is what psychologists do, but I am afraid they do it too freely without taking the trouble to find out what is going on. Their job has no feed back either. If a surgeon cuts off a wrong leg or makes a pigs ear of an operation it is woefully apparent. A Psychologist, on the other hand, can spew forth the biggest load of rubbish and no one will check or know. They are also far to free with dishing out drugs, some with horrific side effects.
Getting back to your experience and thoughts about what is important and how to solve problems. There is something very strange in this world. Time and time again the views of someone who knows the score and has enough experience and foresight to mitigate future problems is ignored in favor of someone who does not have a clue. I have never got to the bottom of this, but it is very common.
I feel a story coming on:
We had a contract to design, develop, and build a helicopter radiometer. Being airborne, power, size, and weight were extremity critical. One of the fundamental controlling factors of the performance was the stability of the master clock. Basically, the better the clock the better the resolution was for a given antenna size. So initially, I focused on getting the clock as good as was practical. After some investigations it was clear that oven controlled xtal oscillators had an order better performance than other types.
At the first technical review meeting I described my proposed hardware design, including the oven controlled Xtal. At the first mention of oven there was an uproar from the project manager. 'You are not using an oven' and that was that. I could get no further discussion on the subject. After the meeting I went to see the project manager to find out what was going on. He was most aggressive and just repeated that I was not going to use an oven. About a week later a large project needed a problem sorting so I got transferred to that as it had a higher priority.
I still kept an eye on the goings on at Helicopter Radiometer and knew the engineer who had taken over from me. He had not used an oven controlled Xtal, but instead used a normal type, with a load of compensation circuits to try and stabilize the master clock over the military temperature range. I learned that the program manager was spreading the word that I was an idiot specifying an oven on a job where power and size were a premium. He also said that my digital approach to the design was not right and would never have worked.
The truth of the mater was that the program manager was a physicist and to him an oven was a big power hungry thing with a door on the front that you cooked samples in. He knew nothing about electronics and was a dyed in the wool analogue advocate, because at least he could understand that. The oven controlled Xtal that i proposed consumed IW maximum at low temperatures. It measured about 10 x 10 x 8mm and it cost, in modern value, £500. It was also off the shelf. Another factor controlling the ultimate performance of the radiometer was drift. A digital approach not only allowed drift to be largely cancelled but, by using CMOS logic, power was much less and the output from the radiometer was digital anyway. I never did clear the innuendo in that department, even after the offending program manager left the company.
As to the Helicopter Radiometer: it stumbled from one problem to another and clock stability and drift compromised the performance badly. So instead of having a tool which would have been leading-edge, the customer got a troublesome run-of-the mill performer. We never got another radiometer job after that.
Last edited: