Harvey, you're looking at things with the typical logic of a forum poster, not with the instantaneous thought of a person ACTUALLY encountering such a situation.
Originally Posted by HiTech **broken link removed**
Ok then, where does the line get drawn when a situation transitions from self-defense to self-offense?
If they don't attack you, then there's no need to defend yourself - pretty simple really.
That thought isn't any different than using gambling or lottery proceeds to benefit senior citizens... or when a church group holds private gambling parties to raise money for a project. IMHO it's still a vice or sin money; it's the questionable method or pretense on how the money was collected and the associated vice is justified because the proceeds are supposedly put to good use for society. Legalized gambling is a perfect example: proceeds $$ benefit local municipalities according to contracts/laws, and provides jobs for many. Gambling addiction help is provided to those who request it. Sounds like a win-win situation for all, other than the shmucks wasting their earnings/savings that perpetuate that vice. It's a dirty, unethical business much the same as the tobacco industry is and illegal narcotics sales.What would happen if they banned tobacco?
Where would all that revenue have to come from next?
Perhaps the anti-smoking supporters would wish they had kept their mouth shut, when it starts to affect their own pocket.....
Harvey, you're looking at things with the typical logic of a forum poster, not with the instantaneous thought of a person ACTUALLY encountering such a situation.
That's only when you're thinking about it reloadron, not in a moment of forced decisions making, I'm not talking about conscious fear or wariness, I'm talking about instant knee jerk gut response, you can't have an opinion on that only a responce, and it's very difficult to measure as putting people in that kind of position for psycology studies is frown upon nowdays.
because forum post are not innate unconscious responses.
What did you say? What are you talking about here? You posted something that is of interest to us? Oh, sorry, I was distracted from reading other's replies.Apparently no one actually reads my posts...
I have read your post, and well quite frankly I just do not agree with your position. For one thing, I do not think the fear of knives is innate, rather it is learned though direct experience such as our first knife boo boo. Through empirical knowledge we learn that a firearm is a much greater threat and is therefore much more frightening as death is a very real possibility. If someone pulls a blade on me, I will go into a defensive posture, if it a gun, I will start crapping myself. I know where you are coming from but I just do not agree.
While living in the Philippines I was on a public Victory Liner bus. We were in route to Manila when the bus got into the cross fire between the PI military and the NPA terrorist group. The bus had to stop and I will never forget nearly pissing myself hearing the sound of an AK rifle. Our bus caught a few rounds and I can assure you that a gun is much more scary than a knife.
OMG, I haven't thought about that ride in years. That was a trip when I would ride between Manila and Cubi Point. Before the volcano ate Cubi and Subic. You stirred some memories with mention of the Victory Liner.
@ Sceadwian, I did read your post and several times. Like a few others I just tend not to agree with the fear factor thing as to what to naturally fear. No big deal and let's hope none of us here ever have to worry about it in real life.
Ron
Apparently no one actually reads my posts...
I said the site of a gun or a knife, not rounds being fired or an actual immanent stabbing. Warfare, with true immanent danger regardless of it's source isn't even closely related to having the likeness of an object weather functional or not in your field of vision suddenly in an otherwise ordinary day. As a visceral reaction more fear is going to be developed by a the site of a knife rather than a gun in the population at large unless the person has intimate experience with being shot at even if you're not the immediate target. We're not talking specifics here, we're talking the mass general psychological response. More people overall have experience with puncture of the skin and slicing from sharp objects than from penetration of a high speed round fired from an object that looks like a gun. We may conciously know that a gun is something to fear, but the innate fear of a blade is much higher in the general population. I garuntee nearly 100% of people are going to say the gun is worse though, because forum post are not innate unconscious responses.
When I've ridden to town on my motorbike and am wearing protective clothing a knife wouldn't scare me at all. I'd just say, "try and stab me" and whack them over the head with my helmet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?