While you can do a good job with a clothes iron it is easier to use a laminator if you can.
PulsarProFx sells a good transfer paper. Tip 3 on their site has a method on simulation the roller action of a laminator with a regular clothes iron. The index to their PCB tips follows.
Why oval pads, more space for in-between traces? How many do you need?
Here is a sample of Express PCB, it uses round pads, you can get in two ten thousands traces, easily. I have only tried one.
Software allows for even thinner traces (.006) but I think that is just for commercial use.
Hi If you consider doing a very sensitive frequency generator or a VCO layout with square pad's there is a frequency disturbance happening in the corners (edges) of the square pads.If you look through an oscilloscope you will notice that.
I don't know what you mean, unless you're talking about >VHF the shape of the pads don't make much difference and even then, I don't see how it makes any difference whether they're square or circular!
Are you ment to iron it on, soak and remove? As I ironed it on good and then lifted the paper off as I moved the iron back, basically, keeping it hot as you peel it off, worked better than I expected!
Hi If you consider doing a very sensitive frequency generator or a VCO layout with square pad's there is a frequency disturbance happening in the corners (edges) of the square pads.If you look through an oscilloscope you will notice that.
Never done it myself, but from previous posts it's supposed to be the thicker / glossy paper that's the best, and some people have experimented with a few different type before getting a type that works best for them.
From using the gloss photo paper, I tend to use pretty high heat and a 'decent' amount of pressure. Push fairly hard, but don't put all your weight on it.
These are only suggestions as I don't use it, but Hero999 hasn't been around since August.