Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

ULN2803 heats up

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see your point. I hadn't thought about EMI problems that would be exacerbated by having the diode located far from the inductive load, so I now understand the need for mounting it close. In the case where there are long wires between the switch and the inductive load, a diode near the switch (built into the ULN series, but not into most other devices) is also desirable.
While it is built in to the UNL series it is also a junk silicon diode not meant for switcher frequencies, hence I still say that if you insist on using them that way add good schottkys instead of relying on the slow ULN silicon.

Dan
 
I would have to agree with Ubergeek63 on that one. If you test the motor with the diodes not connected you will see that the motor is running much smoother and with more torque.

In spite of all the litterature suggesting using diodes, I do not use them in a few drivers that I made using ULN2803 chips:

YouTube - 3 axis CNC for PCB drilling

They have been running for hours and hours and hours without showing any problems, not even loosing steps. Of course, I rund them at 360 RPM wich is slow. I suppose fast diodes would be a must for more sophisticated drivers.

Alain
 
Last edited:
Both the ULN2003 and ULN2803 are rated for 5V operation. The clamp diode voltage is not given, it should be 6.8V/ 0.5W. Following ubergeek63's advice, using a FET will handle the current without alot of heat, and all FETs can share a common heatsink with insulating hardware for each FET. You could try IRF630 or IRF640.
 
Both the ULN2003 and ULN2803 are rated for 5V operation. The clamp diode voltage is not given, it should be 6.8V/ 0.5W. Following ubergeek63's advice, using a FET will handle the current without alot of heat, and all FETs can share a common heatsink with insulating hardware for each FET. You could try IRF630 or IRF640.
At 0.5A@0.4Ω and $1.75 each, the IRF630 would not need any heat sinking.

Depending on competency level, the FDC6561AN could be a better choice at $0.50 each for 2 FETs in a SOT23-6 for a 30V part.

Dan
 
Both the ULN2003 and ULN2803 are rated for 5V operation.

Both the ULN2003 and ULN2803 are rated for 5V operation at the input pins.

Their outputs are open collector, so they are usefull level shifters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top