We are all just wasting our breath with this guy. It is so manifestly obvious that he is approaching VHDL as if it were a procedural language for implementing algorithms. He does not seem to get the idea that VHDL is a description language, the purpose of which is to synthesize a device to replicate the bahavior.
We are all just wasting our breath with this guy. It is so manifestly obvious that he is approaching VHDL as if it were a procedural language for implementing algorithms. He does not seem to get the idea that VHDL is a description language, the purpose of which is to synthesize a device to replicate the bahavior.
We know this. We've told him this. He should know this. Yet he keeps asking the same question with the same kind of example. It's almost as though an evil gnome keeps feeding him the same question over and over and orver.....