Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

XNOR circuit - Can any one build XNOR circuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
1629589804245.png


1629589984047.png



Regards, Dana.
 
The circuits in post #41 are XOR not XNOR.
Their main disadvantage is they they waste more than more than normal lamp current when one one input is on, and more than twice the lamp current when both inputs are on.
 
Last edited:
The point of the post, which I should have stated, was simplicity of
logic w/o active components. And yes they are not a low power design.

And XNOR switch in one leg the R and switch.

Regards, Dana.
 
Last edited:
The point of the post, which I should have stated, was simplicity of
logic w/o active components. And yes they are not a low power design.
Okay.
It would appear that the bottom two circuits are the same except one uses four discrete diodes and the other uses a four-diode bridge.

So you don't consider diodes to be an active component?
 
Last edited:
I'm using a PNP to drive the LED, not an NPN.
Hm. You're using PNPs (2N3906) for ALL 3 transistors. Which I recognised, and tried, and decided must be a mistake as that was even less 'working' than with NPNs:

1629597166596.png

Of course, if you'd shared your LTSpice implementation, I wouldn't have had to try recreate it myself.
 
Last edited:
Hey sxy, if you find all this as confusing and unhelpful as I do, let's continue via PM and let the one-uppers play amongst themselves.
 
must be a mistake as that was even less 'working' than with NPNs:
Not surprising it doesn't work since you have Q1 and Q2 backwards.
if you'd shared your LTSpice implementation, I wouldn't have had to try recreate it myself.
Since you were using Falstad, I didn't think you had LTspice.
Below is the LTspice file.
 

Attachments

  • XOR XNOR 3-Transistor.asc
    2 KB · Views: 229
Circuit: * C:\Users\ms20b\Documents\XOR XNOR 3-Transistor.asc

Error on line 8 : d1 p002 n003 ledred
Unable to find definition of model "ledred"
Direct Newton iteration for .op point succeeded.

Date: Sun Aug 22 04:17:02 2021
Total elapsed time: 12.015 seconds.

tnom = 27
temp = 27
method = modified trap
totiter = 3680
traniter = 3667
tranpoints = 1640
accept = 1478
rejected = 162
matrix size = 20
fillins = 2
solver = Normal
Matrix Compiler1: 1.36 KB object code size 0.4/0.3/[0.3]
Matrix Compiler2: off [0.2]/0.5/1.1
 
Error on line 8 : d1 p002 n003 ledred
Unable to find definition of model "ledred"
Just use an LED model that you have in your LTspice library.
 
Last edited:
Just use an LED model that you have in your LTspice library.
I have an LTSpice library?

That's why I used Falstad to demo for sxy; no dependancies. (Nor steep learning curve; nor stupid UI;...)
(+ visual indication of current flows and rates; mouse over scoping;...)
 
Last edited:
sxy,

See here for a working Falstad implementation of Crutschow's XOR/XNOR circuits. Note that the XNOR version is the XOR + a NOT gate to invert the output.
 
Last edited:
Okay.
It would appear that the bottom two circuits are the same except one uses four discrete diodes and the other uses a four-diode bridge.

So you don't consider diodes to be an active component?







Regards, Dana.
 
Definition(s) -

https://www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/active-vs-passive-components-in-electronics
That states a diode is an active device.
1629649460851.png

So take your pick.
 
As you can see there is no biblical definition of active versus passive.

But that guys def leaves one to wonder why he considered diodes as active

In a nutshell, active components can, generally speaking, inject power into a circuit and are capable of electrically controlling and amplifying the flow of electrical current, whereas passive components cannot.

Of course we can spend a year or two debating what applies to what in the above def.....UGH.

Here they are considered passive, but then broadly classify tube's as active, would that
also be true of tubes with no elements, no connections. Silly.



But then -





Lets debate this until neither of us is breathing anymore.


Regards, Dana.
 
Lets debate this until neither of us is breathing anymore.
Naw, I'm good.
I don't have enough breaths left anymore to use them for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top