I think it is me in this case because they are objects. I is used for subjects.Hmm... is that correct ? Shouldn't it be "me" ?
"He and I" (He/I needs/need to go drive that car.")
"Him or/and me." (Punch him/me.)
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it is me in this case because they are objects. I is used for subjects.Hmm... is that correct ? Shouldn't it be "me" ?
Search & Destroy is what the military does or a male civilian in a bar looking for women. Hunt n' Peck is barnyard foul feeding about or me at a keyboard.dknguyen said:Search and destroy sounds cooler than hunt and peck.
Search & Destroy is what the military does or a male civilian in a bar looking for women.
i can't find the ridiculous part of HiTechs' sentence.Marks256 said:Is it just me, or am i laughing so much, that i can't type straight?
Actually, you should figure this out on your own. If this is for school, then it would benefit you more to use your head. Sorry if this is a disappointment to you, but it is in your best interests.
Starting to sound like someone who was on this board everyday with 39 questions! Didn't the Moderators end up booting him?1. What is a Schmitt Trigger?
2. What is a Schottky? (and how is it pronounced?)
3. What is a compariator, how does it work? Is it digtial? What could they be used for?
Sorry Marks,
I should have put some smilies in there! I'm only giving you the gears.
audioguru said:Of course an opamp can be used for a slow comparator, but its output isn't an open collector.
Hi
Need to clarify with you, what do you mean by the output isn't an open collector.
A comparator has the collector of an NPN transistor for its output so that other comparator outputs can be joined together to make a NOR gate.fstspec said:Need to clarify with you, what do you mean by the output isn't an open collector.audioguru said:Of course an opamp can be used for a slow comparator, but its output isn't an open collector.
we will be able to overcome the language barrier.
lol no. 98% of the human population is too stupid to understand that.Marks256 said:There should be a universal language. This would be great. I think it should be mathematically based. Something that everybody from any language should understand. Math is understood in all languages, correct? So, if someone that spoke English, was to give this to a Spanish-speaking person; 2+2, he/she should understand it, correct? There should be a way to communicate with just strictly numbers. I'm not talking ASCII, or the like, I'm talking strictly numbers. Binary would be awesome, like a processor has commands, have binary numbers for objects. This would be great, but there would have to be 128+bits that would have to be learned. There must be something easier. What about equations? That would be cool. Does anyone have any ideas?
This would be far too complicated! Don't tell me you understand equations of this complexity so fast, that you immediately can write one as an answer...What about equations?
lol no. 98% of the human population is too stupid to understand that.
Most people even do not speak their own native languages properly
Once i was younger, and I had the same idea ... therefore i created a language based on an alphanumerical system in hexadecimal numbers.
four hex number define a word stem, its prefix defines its function, whether verb/noun/adjective/adverb/positionmarker etc., and its first suffix/postfix defines the case, the temporal position, and for a verb its conjugation.
The sentence structure is variable, because it is a synthetic language.
The language had about 30 different cases ( english has only 3 ( or 4... ) )
and a complicated tense system. i.e. even a noun could carry a time mark, defining the time it performed the action described by the verb.
... there's much more to tell about it
This would be far too complicated! Don't tell me you understand equations of this complexity so fast, that you immediately can write one as an answer...
Ahh, math. A world of wonderful delights and spin-chilling terrors.Marks256 said:No, i can't. I am going into Geometry and Algebra II this year. I was lucky enough to be able to get two math classes in this year. That way i will be farther ahead of where i should be. Hopefully, if everything goes good this year, and i have the chance next year, i will try to do the same thing!
Ahh, math. A world of wonderful delights and spin-chilling terrors.
Ok i'll write something and post it here This even doesn't go off topic because it's one of your questionsCare to tell more? Sound interesting [..] May i see some of it?
I am going into Geometry and Algebra II this year.
Having success in maths is not that difficult - actually we all are capable of doing maths; Some exercised, and solved problem, with examples, and everything shall work fine.I was lucky enough to be able to get two math classes in this year. That way i will be farther ahead of where i should be. Hopefully, if everything goes good this year, and i have the chance next year, i will try to do the same thing!
Hmm CalTech, maybe -I am not sure what college i would like to attend. I was thinking NDSU(North Dakota State University), or MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Does anyone have any more suggestions? I would prefer it if it was in the USA* or in Canada.
Having success in maths is not that difficult - actually we all are capable of doing maths; Some exercised, and solved problem, with examples, and everything shall work fine.
Calculus is easy - Complex analysis in multidimensional space is funnyI'd like to hear what you think of math when you get get to the material that lies beyond 3 dimensional calculus .
_nox_ said:Calculus is easy - Complex analysis in multidimensional space is funny
I simply love mathematics - the more difficult the better.