Hi Tony,
Wow that is quite a capacitance swing there. With the scope and wave generator method though the swing in capacitance would not matter, as long as the voltage was kept low and of course there is no ESR swing to worry about.
The basic equation is of course:
Z=R-j/wC
where R is the internal resistance and C is the internal capacitance, and they are connected in series.
Since the capacitance effect is still imaginary it wont affect the real resistance. This would still happen because the voltage across the internal cap C does not get a chance to change before the measurement of the resistance R is made. This is part of the beauty of a time domain approach and it is really the very reason it works. I dont think a single frequency frequency domain approach can show this as clearly unless maybe the amplitude is also limited. But in any case, the time domain approach is a measurement of what actually happens in the real application anyway, which is nice in itself.
Wow that is quite a capacitance swing there. With the scope and wave generator method though the swing in capacitance would not matter, as long as the voltage was kept low and of course there is no ESR swing to worry about.
The basic equation is of course:
Z=R-j/wC
where R is the internal resistance and C is the internal capacitance, and they are connected in series.
Since the capacitance effect is still imaginary it wont affect the real resistance. This would still happen because the voltage across the internal cap C does not get a chance to change before the measurement of the resistance R is made. This is part of the beauty of a time domain approach and it is really the very reason it works. I dont think a single frequency frequency domain approach can show this as clearly unless maybe the amplitude is also limited. But in any case, the time domain approach is a measurement of what actually happens in the real application anyway, which is nice in itself.