And since your tests indicated what I consider an appropriate Vin for the KIS-3R33S IC, this is the basis for my conclusion that the KIS-3R33S is defective, given the Vout value you noted on the failed DAC, as compared with those values noted for the working DAC.
I never tested the working DAC or mentioned any Vin value from it, just values for the defective unit with and without the tube , this is the first test I'm about to do since you told me to "perform
all the exact same tests on the working DAC board":
Since I was going to test the working DAC board as well, I decided to do so at desk where I have the working Aune T1 is located and also its power supply and I've notice the Vin on the defective dac board with the tube the Vin is just 14.9VDC, 1V less than yesterday so I checked the other psu and gave me a 15.7VDC Vin which is still 0.1-.02V less than yesterday but maybe it's the cheap multimeter. After that I checked both PSUs and the PSU from the working dac is more like 16.5-01-16.5AC and the one from the defective dac is 17.5-0-17.5AC. Wondering if this might be, over time, part of the original cause of the problem.
Anyway I've tested the working board with both PSUs and it runs just fine with both but there is a difference in the Vin of 0.9VDC (21.2V vs 22.1V) but I'll try to limit the some of the info to just the 16.5-01-16.5AC PSU, unless I mention it's with both.
With the tube connected the Vin on the working board is 21.2VDC vs 14.9VDC on the defective board. The Vout on the working board is 6.2VDC(with both PSUs) whilst the Vout on the defective board is 1.58VDC(with both PSUs).
Without the tube the Vin on the working board is 22V whilst on the defective board it stars above 16.8VDC and drops to 15.7VDC when the light turns on. The Vout on the working board is 6.26VDC whilst on the defective board it stars at 6.23VDC then drops to 6.07VDC.
Judging by this I'd say the KIS-3R33S on the defective board is not getting enough power but I don't really know so please do tell me if this makes sense or not.
Defective board without the tube, negative on ground positive on:
Pin1:-0.43V at start up to -0.47V when the light turns on
Pin2:stable at around -16.85V
Pin3:-22.3V stable
Pin4:0V stable
Pin5:6.23V drops to 6.07V when the light turns on
Pin6:-0.43V at start up to -0.47V when the light turns on
Pin7:stable at around -16.85V
Pin8:-22.3V stable
Pin9:0V stable
Functional board without the tube, negative on ground positive on:
Pin1:22.1V stable
Pin2:-16.5V stable
Pin3:-21.9V stable
Pin4:0V stable
Pin5:6.26V stable
Pin6:22.1 stable
Pin7:-16.5V stable
Pin8:-21.9V stable
Pin9:0V stable
While I think the idea of using a valve in something like this is particularly silly (and just a con for the gullible), I'm even more bemused that they use an RF twin-triode rather than an audio one.
Even if the tube is only there as gimmick I've not seem anyone to say it sounds bad at the price point. Though I really have no idea what the tube does in the circuit I can tell you that it does do something that changes the sound as I've tried tubes with which it sounds horrible and even with the good ones there are discernable differences which I think was the original point of the whole device.
I was just dancing all around that sentiment (in deference to the OP) even though the apparent circuitry simply did not add up to a working dual triode. Either as a stereo amp (why would headphones even need that level of amplification?) or simple follower; which would make more sense if what was intended was to introduce a "tube" influence into the audio stream (which is real, but I'm not sure that everyone can discern or quantify the difference from straight digital).
The AMP board is separate and it's solid state only, it's still quite powerful but it's nothing special.